'Out of the Furnace' tries to speak to our times but falls short

'Out of the Furnace' stars Christian Bale and Casey Affleck.

Kerry Hayes/Relativity Media/AP
'Out of the Furnace' stars Christian Bale (l.) and Zoe Saldana (r.).

Puffed with self-importance, “Out of the Furnace” wants to be a movie that speaks to America’s riven soul – a “Deer Hunter” for our time. Writer-director Scott Cooper, who made a marvelous debut a few years back with “Crazy Heart,” has gone full serioso here, but what he is aiming for and what he hits are miles apart.

Christian Bale plays Russell Baze, a steel mill worker in Braddock, Pa. whose brother, Rodney (Casey Affleck), is a troubled Iraq war veteran. The film, before it jumps ahead, opens in 2008 during the Obama ascendancy. Russell ends up doing jail time for a fatal car accident, and Rodney is stop-lossed for another tour of duty.

Russell, out of prison, can’t quite accept that his girlfriend (Zoe Saldana) has taken up with the local sheriff (Forest Whitaker). Rodney, instead of following in the heavy footsteps of his brother and father in the mills, is making chump change on the local bare-knuckle boxing circuit. He wants a bigger score – not always doable since his warrior instincts kick in whenever he’s supposed to take a dive.

Rodney gets involved with an ultra-scurvy bunch of promoters from the New Jersey backwoods headed by Woody Harrelson’s DeGroat, a man who makes Willem Dafoe (who is also in the picture) seem like Don Knotts.

The recession-era hardships of the working class, the hopelessness and anomie, plus the derangements of the returning vets, all get a superficial airing here. But Cooper doesn’t make much of a case for why the derangements in this movie are an expression of our age’s ills. Rodney’s hair-trigger rages and self-destructiveness would appear to long predate his war experiences, and life in the steel mills has always been grievous. And bad guys like DeGroat are everpresent. This is fire-breathing melodrama masquerading as social commentary. Grade: C+ (Rated R for strong violence, language and drug content.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.