Oh, the shark has such teeth, dear

Whatever the source of the word shark, it was contact with the Americas that brought the category to wide awareness in England.

Antonio Bronic/Reuters
A leopard shark swims at the Aquarium Pula, Croatia, July 25, 2018. What is the real origin of the word "shark"?

In 1569, fishermen were catching mackerel in the English Channel when a huge creature rushed into their nets, almost destroying them. 

They brought it on board and “marveled,” as it was the strangest animal they had ever seen. It was 17 feet long, had three rows of razor-sharp teeth, and ended in a long, powerful tail – so bizarre-looking that it was put on display in a London pub. 

English had no word for such a creature, one of the exhibitors claimed: “There is no proper name for it that I know, but certain men of Captain Hawkins’ call it a Sharke.”

People had been fishing in the British Isles for more than a thousand years – how could this have been the first shark ever caught? “Shark,” it turns out, was a new category of animal, resulting from European voyages of trade and exploration to the Americas.

Along the coasts of England, Scotland, and Ireland, people had long been familiar with sharp-toothed, rough-skinned fish, but they were usually small and known as “dogfish.”

Slave trader John Hawkins was one of the first to bring back news of another kind of creature, “like unto those which we call dogge-fishes” but much bigger and more “ravenous,” eager to bite the legs off anyone who ventured into the sea. As news of this fascinating animal spread, and as British fishermen, in bigger vessels, ventured farther and farther away from the coastline, they realized that there were sharks in British waters, too.

Where does the word shark come from? 

Some etymologists have argued that it derives from xoc, a Mayan word for toothy creatures that seems to have included sharks, crocodiles, and some whales. Captain Hawkins and his men used the word tiberunes as well, which, in a development parallel to English, became Spanish for “large shark” (tiburón), as opposed to the more commonly encountered small sharks, cazones. Tiburon seems to have been the Carib name for shark, so perhaps Europeans simply adopted the words they heard around them to refer to these unfamiliar creatures.

This would be a beautiful etymology, if not for one troublesome elasmobranch. In 1442, Thomas Bekynton recorded that his ship was followed by “a fish called le Shark” as he sailed from England to France. The word then, cannot be of Mayan origin, since this predates the first voyages to the Americas.

What is the real origin of shark? It is a bit of an anticlimax, actually. No one knows.

Whatever the source of the word, though, it was contact with the Americas that brought the category to wide awareness in England, popularizing the large, razor-toothed shark as opposed to the small, harmless dogfish. 

These toothy predators of the sea have been terrifying us ever since.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Oh, the shark has such teeth, dear
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today