'X-Men: Apocalypse': A new trailer and how the franchise has revitalized itself

The 'X-Men' movies seemed to run out of steam with the release of 2006's 'X-Men: The Last Stand.' But like other movie series, it's been reborn creatively with new movies like 'X-Men: Days of Future Past.'

A trailer has arrived for the upcoming superhero film “X-Men: Apocalypse.” 

“Apocalypse” features the return of actors James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, and Jennifer Lawrence and introduces new players such as “Game of Thrones” actress Sophie Turner.

The trailer introduces the villain Apocalypse, who wins over characters such as Magneto (Fassbender).

The movie, which arrives this spring, comes after the release of the critically well-received 2014 box office winner “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” which also stars McAvoy, Fassbender, and Lawrence.

The “X-Men” series is one of a few popular science fiction and fantasy franchises that have reinvented themselves creatively and become acclaimed series again. 

The “X-Men” stories were first adapted with the successful 2000 movie “X-Men.” Two more movies were released, but the third, 2006’s “X-Men: The Last Stand,” was not enjoyed by critics or many fans. 

But the series followed a new direction beginning with 2011’s “X-Men: First Class.” A new director was brought on (Bryan Singer, who directed the first two successful “X-Men” movies, would return later) and the roles recast, with McAvoy, Fassbender, and Lawrence arriving to play younger versions of “X-Men” characters Professor Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique. “Class” and the movie that followed it, “Future,” were both well-received by critics and did well at the box office. 

“Star Trek” is another film series that seemed to sputter out but was rejuvenated by new talent. Movies were made featuring the casts of both the original TV show and of “Star Trek: The Next Generation.” 

But 2002’s “Star Trek Nemesis” with the “Generation” cast did not do well at the box office or with critics.

When new director J.J. Abrams came aboard and actors Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, among others, were cast as younger versions of the classic characters, the new movie, 2009’s “Star Trek,” was well-received by reviewers and became a box office smash. 

The “Star Wars” series is attempting the same move. The original trilogy that was released in the 1970s and ‘80s is one of the most beloved film series of all time. But while the new trilogy, released in the late 1990s and 2000s, did well at the box office, the movies weren’t hits with critics or fans. 

Abrams is helming the new movie, “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” and new actors like John Boyega and Daisy Ridley star in the movie, though the original stars are returning as well. 

For these movies, bringing in new talent most likely brings in more creativity and revitalizes the stories. And hiring new people signals to fans that a new movie won’t be more of the same – those behind the films are making an effort to try something new.

We’ll see if the “X-Men” series can continue its creative winning streak with this spring’s new film.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'X-Men: Apocalypse': A new trailer and how the franchise has revitalized itself
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today