'Dancing With the Stars': Why a former Backstreet Boy could win it all

Another celebrity contestant departed the reality competition 'Dancing' as the end of the season nears. Meanwhile, can 'Dancing' pull in younger viewers?

Adam Taylor/ABC/AP
'Dancing With the Stars' contestants Lindsay Arnold (l.) and Alek Skarlatos (r.) perform on the show.

The newest episode of “Dancing With the Stars” ended with the departure of singer Andy Grammer and his professional dance partner.

The “Honey, I’m Good” singer and his partner, Allison Holker, left the show after performing a Viennese waltz during a week in which contestants were asked to base their routines around someone who inspired them. Grammer spoke about his late mother. 

Meanwhile, former Backstreet Boy Nick Carter and his partner Sharna Burgess earned a perfect score of 30 for the night. Two teams tied for second place, conservationist Bindi Irwin and her partner Derek Hough, and singer Tamar Braxton and her partner Val Chmerkovskiy.

"Dancing" is approaching the end of this season's competition, so it will be interesting to see if the three can maintain the momentum to make it to the end.

"Dancing With the Stars" remains a popular show in terms of overall viewers – during the 2014-2015 TV season, “Dancing” placed among the top 10 most-watched shows of the year, coming in ninth. 

However, “Dancing” seems to appeal mostly to older viewers. Among the desirable 18-49 demographic, the show doesn't even crack the top 40.

By comparison, the NBC competition “The Voice” manages to appeal more widely to different demographics, drawing more 18-49-year-old viewers, coming in tenth place for the 2014-2015 TV season.

Why is “Voice” so much more popular with young viewers? The singing reality competition has an unusual gimmick: judges listen to prospective contestants with their chairs turned away and must decide whether they like them based only upon their voices. Perhaps younger viewers are attracted by this fresh concept, which is different from previous singing competitions like “American Idol” and “The Voice.” 

In addition, "Voice" judges are often musicians who have current hits. For the latest season, judge Adam Levine’s band Maroon 5 has been a consistent presence on the Billboard Hot 100. Judge Blake Shelton's "Reloaded: 20 #1 Hits" was released in Oct.Millennial viewers are no doubt familiar with the songs of judge Gwen Stefani’s band No Doubt, and judge Pharrell Williams has had several recent hits over the past few years, including his mega-hit “Happy” and collaborations with Daft Punk and Robin Thicke. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Dancing With the Stars': Why a former Backstreet Boy could win it all
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today