Here's what critics are saying about new Broadway musical 'Tuck Everlasting'

'Tuck' is based on the classic children's novel of the same name by Natalie Babbitt and stars Sarah Charles Lewis, Andrew Keenan-Bolger, and Terrence Mann.

Joan Marcus/Matt Ross Public Relations/AP
'Tuck Everlasting' stars Sarah Charles Lewis (r.) and Andrew Keenan-Bolger (l.).

A musical based on the classic Natalie Babbitt children's novel "Tuck Everlasting" has opened on Broadway and depicts the well-known story of a young girl who meets an immortal family. 

"Tuck" was first published in 1975 and centers on Winnie Foster, a young girl who must decide whether to continue with her normal life or drink from a magic spring and join the Tuck family, who will live forever.

The musical version stars Sarah Charles Lewis in her Broadway debut as Winnie, Andrew Keenan-Bolger of "Newsies" as Tuck's brother Jesse, and "Les Miserables" actor Terrence Mann as the Man in the Yellow Suit, who suspects something is strange about the Tuck family. 

New York Times writer Charles Isherwood found the show to be "warm-spirited and piercingly touching." 

"[Director Casey Nicholaw] also evinces a natural feel for the tender emotional core of the material and even its layers of mildly dark philosophical inquiry," Mr. Isherwood writes. "The actors throughout are excellent." However, he noted that the show "can sometimes be a little ham-handed in addressing its central theme, the notion that life's beauty is inseparable from its inevitable end."

And Mark Kennedy of the Associated Press called the show "wonderfully crafted.... Poignancy mixes well with humor, the songs are fresh and sweet, the set is blissful and the performances honest." 

However, Chris Jones of The Chicago Tribune writes that those behind the musical are "determined to tell the story of those who drink from the waters of eternal life in the language of whimsy.... Even much of the acting is plumby and fantastical.... But it removes much of the tension from a story filled with agonizing decision-making and enough talk of life and death to keep anyone awake at night. Such an approach distances the audience from the piece." 

The Broadway musical is only the newest adaptation of Ms. Babbitt's story, with the narrative having been brought to the big screen for a 2002 film starring Alexis Bledel, William Hurt, and Sissy Spacek, among other versions. 

In terms of the appeal of the novel, a Booklist review wrote that "Tuck" discusses themes about which many wonder: "Beautiful and descriptive language is the strength of Babbitt's fantasy about Winnie and her encounter with the Tuck family, who cause her – and readers – to ponder an important question: What would it be like to live forever?"  

Meanwhile, author Gregory Maguire wrote of the book, "This novel will live for a long time. Maybe not forever. Very few things last forever. If I had to make a bet about lasting value, though, I’d bet that 'Tuck Everlasting' will continue to intrigue readers young and old...."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Here's what critics are saying about new Broadway musical 'Tuck Everlasting'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today