A new look for pound puppies

Animal shelters and rescue groups are starting campaigns on Twitter, Instagram, and other social media platforms in which they send out photos of shelter animals to attract potential owners.

Hilary Walker/AP
Marlo from #muttbombing

It’s no secret that photos of animals are hard to resist. But what about those heartbreaking images of sad cats and dogs who are waiting to be adopted from shelters? For many it’s just an invitation to look away. But thanks to some feel-good initiatives by dog lovers, the positive “paw-er” of social media is being harnessed to show shelter animals in a more appealing light to find them homes. Campaigns across Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook are saving a tiny portion of the estimated 3 million to 4 million dogs and cats euthanized every year in the United States.

Dallas Pets Alive, a volunteer rescue group in Texas, started digitally adding adoptable dogs to “selfies” (self-portraits taken with a smart phone) posted by users on Instagram, and then reposting them with messages such as, “Can I come home with you?” They began their #muttbombing campaign in February, featuring 26 mutts mugging alongside celebrities and ordinary tourists. So far, 18 have been adopted – such as Sandy, a sheltie mix that was added to the famous photo tweeted out by Ellen DeGeneres from the Oscars – compared with only four during the same period last year.

Then there is Brandon Stanton and his newly adopted 13-year-old dog, Susie, with a wispy white mohawk. When Mr. Stanton, photographer and curator of the well-known blog Humans of New York, formed a bond with his older pooch, it inspired his girlfriend, Erin O’Sullivan, to start a Facebook page called Susie the Dog, featuring older dogs who need homes. In its first three months, the page received more than 150,000 “likes” from Facebook followers, and at least 50 dogs whose photos have been posted are now curling up with new owners.

There’s little downside to this approach, says Inga Fricke of the Washington, D.C., area Humane Society. “Social media has become a hugely valuable tool for shelters and rescues to reach people” and convince them to adopt, she says.

Amanda Britt attributes the fact that she and her family have a new dog, Flora, to the social media savvy of Shannon Johnstone, a photographer in Raleigh, N.C., who takes portrait shots of shelter dogs as part of her Landfill Dogs project. The name intends to provoke. A grassy landfill is where Ms. Johnstone takes a dog most in need of finding a home for a playful photo session. It’s also a place where dogs who do not find homes will eventually end up. Part social statement, part public service, and part art, Johnstone posts her photos on Facebook. Some 92 percent of the dogs she’s photographed have found homes.

“The Landfill Dogs project had everything to do with [us] getting Flora,” says Ms. Britt.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.