Stolen Van Goghs returned to Dutch museum

The two paintings, titled 'Seascape at Scheveningen' (1882) and 'Congregation leaving the Reformed Church in Nuenen' (1884-1885), were stolen in a nighttime heist 15 years ago and recovered by police in Italy.

Peter Dejong/AP
Van Gogh Museum director Axel Rueger, left, and Jet Bussemaker, Minister for Education, Culture and Science, walk towards two stolen and recovered paintings by Dutch master Vincent van Gogh during a press conference in Amsterdam, the Netherlands on Tuesday.

Two paintings by Vincent Van Gogh have returned to Amsterdam’s Van Gogh Museum, more than fourteen years after they were stolen by thieves who broke into the museum and spirited them away for sale to an Italian mobster.

The Dutch master's "Seascape at Scheveningen," and "Congregation leaving the Reformed Church in Nuenen," painted in 1882 and 1884-85, respectively, were recovered in September by Italian police in a hidden wall space in a villa that prosecutors say belonged to Raffaele Imperiale, who is accused of running an international cocaine trafficking ring.

The paintings' return was one of the "most special days in the history of our museum," museum director Axel Rueger said on Tuesday, according to the Associated Press.

 

“Seascape at Scheveningen,” whose paint contains sand that blew onto the canvas as the artist worked during a summer storm on the beach, depicts a small ship in the midst of breaking waves, with dark storm clouds overhead. It is the museum’s only work from Mr. Van Gogh’s period of study in The Hague.

“Congregation Leaving the Reformed Church in Nuenen” shows a church in the southern province of Brabant, where Van Gogh’s father was a minister, according to the museum, and was made for Van Gogh’s mother, who was confined to her bed with a broken leg. Upon his father’s death, the painter added black-clad figures of mourning.

Both paintings, which have suffered relatively minor damage since the 2002 heist, will go back on display at the museum until mid-May, after which they will be removed to the museum's conservation studio for repair.

The paintings' return is accompanied by a Dutch television documentary about the heist. Octave Durham, one of the two men who carried out the theft, for which he later served just over 25 months in prison, appears in the documentary, bragging of his swift entry and exit from the museum – including a jarring descent from a rope on the way out that chipped paint on the seascape’s bottom left corner – and subsequent sale, for about $380,000, to Mr. Imperiale, who was selling marijuana in an Amsterdam coffee shop, according to the New York Times.

As The Christian Science Monitor’s Ellen Powell noted in September, authorities believe the paintings were purchased by Imperiale as part of an effort to sink profits from drug trafficking into assets. Police have seized some 20 million euros ($22 million) from Imperiale, who is believed to be living in Dubai. In January, he was sentenced to 20 years in prison, and Italian authorities are seeking his extradition.

Investigators were led to the paintings by an alleged fellow member of the trafficking ring, who was arrested along with 10 others last January. But their initial break came from an August 2016 letter to the Naples public prosecutor from Imperiale himself, who admitted that he was in possession of the paintings. 

The precise value fetched by the two paintings is largely a matter of guesswork, as neither have been put up on art markets, but Italian police estimate it at about 50 million euros ($53.97 million) each. 

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.