Can Congressional legislation beat scalper bots?

Vendors who use “bots” to snatch up event tickets, only to later resell them at considerable markups, may soon be subject to federal prosecution.

Bebeto Matthews/ AP
People line up to see the Broadway musical 'Hamilton,' Saturday Nov. 19, 2016, in New York. Scalpers may have earned more than $10 million reselling tickets to the runaway hit. The show's producers earned $3 million for the same performances.

A federal bill targeting online scalpers may soon become law, as Congress members try to buckle down on exorbitant ticket prices.

The legislation, which was passed by Congress on Wednesday, is designed to crack down on software-based ticket scalping. If the bill is signed into law by President Obama, vendors who use “bots” to snatch up event tickets, only to later resell them at considerable markups, will be subject to prosecution under the Federal Trade Commission Act.  

“The average fan vying to purchase a ticket to a popular concert has little hope of competing against brokers, many of whom use illegal and unfair means to purchase tickets,” said an earlier report, released in January by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

It’s simple economics: When the demand for seats exceeds supply, anyone fortunate enough to have bought their ticket in time can sell it above face value. But many of today’s scalpers aren’t waiting outside the venue entrance with extra seats, as was the case in previous decades.

The most egregious modern scalpers use bots – sometimes hundreds of them, each one purchasing the maximum number of tickets for several events at a time. It’s increasingly difficult to detect these bots, because many of them are adept at imitating human behavior. Some even misclick or use the delete key, just to trick ticketing websites into thinking they’re real people, according to a New York Times investigation

"With the speed of the internet, scalpers have greater reach into ticket purchasing than ever before," Tiff Fehr reported for the Times:

The professional tier of scalpers buys and sell thousands of tickets a year, and leverages millions of dollars of inventory. Some scalpers use custom-written software to manage their inventories and adjust their prices based on real-time market analysis, much like traders on Wall Street. (It should come as no surprise they prefer to be called brokers.)

Attorney General Schneiderman’s report identified a single broker who was able to purchase 1,012 tickets to a U2 concert in 2014, just one minute after they went on sale. By the end of the day, two vendors had bought up 15,000 tickets from that tour.

Performances in just one month, the Times reported, may have earned scalpers more than $10 million by reselling “Hamilton” tickets. The show’s producers, by comparison, earned around $3 million from the same performances. “Hamilton” producer Jeffrey Seller testified at a Senate hearing in September.

Ticketing and resale sites, such as Ticketmaster and StubHub, promised in January to cooperate with investigations surrounding illegal scalping.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Can Congressional legislation beat scalper bots?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today