What's behind the #ImNoAngel beauty campaign?

Plus-size retailer Lane Bryant challenges Victoria's Secret's stereotypical body type and definition of beauty with its spring lingerie collection.

Lane Bryant, a women's clothing company specializing in sizes 14 to 28, launched the #ImNoAngel campaign for its lingerie line Cacique Monday. "I'm No Angel" is part of a global shift that's redefining beauty and attractiveness and directly challenging the impossible stereotype of an emaciated, photo-shopped model. 

In an age, too, where marketing surveys show that authenticity is a value cherished by both millennials and baby boomers, this is seen as a smart business move. 

The black-and-white photos show industry models Ashley Graham, Marquita Pring, Candice Huffine, Victoria Lee, Justine Legault, and Elly Mayday clothed in Cacique lingerie and confidently defying society's limited standards of beauty. The photos were taken by photographer Cass Bird and will be featured in a series of TV commercials and advertisements for the brand's spring campaign.

“Our ‘#ImNoAngel’ campaign is designed to empower ALL women to love every part of herself. Lane Bryant firmly believes that she is sexy and we want to encourage her to confidently show it, in her own way,” Lane Bryant CEO and President Linda Heasley said in a statement.

The name "I'm No Angel" is a clear dig at Victoria's Secret, which calls its uber-thin cast of models “angels.” Last year the lingerie giant was accused of body shaming when it launched a campaign that defined the “perfect body” in very specific and limited terms. However, Lane Bryant suggests that the name isn't meant to be an insult to Victoria's Secret.

 Lane Bryant's "I'm No Angel" campaign is the most recent in a series of moves by companies – as well as countries – to challenge and counteract damaging concepts of Western beauty in the media and within the fashion industry.

Earlier this month, France joined Italy, Israel, and Spain in banning unhealthily thin models in advertising campaigns and on catwalks. While this could lead to body policing issues of its own, it does discourage modeling agencies and fashion houses from hiring models with unhealthy body mass indexes.

Tess Holiday, who is five-foot-five and a size 22, recently signed with MiLK Model Management in the UK, making her the first plus-size model to sign a major modeling contract.

American Eagle Outfitters’ lingerie brand Aerie began its "Aerie Real" campaign in 2014, in which it vowed not to airbrush or retouch any of its models because "the real you is sexy." The company has since earned the approval of the National Eating Disorders Association for its portrayal of real bodies.

The "I’m No Angel" campaign is a departure from the unrealistic standards of beauty that have plagued the media worldwide and gets consumers accustomed to seeing real people in advertisements. However, many observers say that there is still a great deal of progress to be made.

Northwestern University Professor Renee Engeln, who is an expert in objectification theory and body image and the media, said in an email to the Monitor that “little change is likely” if plus-size models such as Tess Holiday remain the exception. “It takes more than one model to start re-shaping how we think about women’s bodies."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.