Half the globe is now online: How to connect the other half?

A UN report reveals that 47 percent of humanity will have internet access by the end of next year, but most of the developing world remains offline. 

Adnan Abidi/Reuters/File
Mark Zuckerberg addresses the internet.org summit in New Delhi, Oct. 9, 2014.

By the end of the year 3.5 billion people, 47 percent of the global population, will have access to the internet, according to a new report from the United Nations International Telecommunications Union.

But internet access is far from evenly distributed. While 80 percent of the population in developed countries uses the internet, only 40 percent has access in developing countries, and less than 15 percent in less-developed countries (LDCs) do, leaving female, elderly, less educated, poorer, and rural populations offline.

"Internet penetration levels in LDCs today have reached the level enjoyed by developed countries in 1998, suggesting that the LDCs are lagging nearly 20 years behind the developed countries," the report said.

To address this problem, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerburg launched internet.org, an initiative to bring internet access and the benefits of connectivity to the entire world. He quickly discovered that spreading internet to impoverished regions comes with a litany of structural, political, and economic challenges.

While internet companies have expanded affordable smartphone and data plan options in wealthy areas, they have less incentive to push into poorer markets. The report blames the high costs associated with extending services and infrastructure to remote areas as one of the reasons non-wealthy areas lag behind.

To bypass infrastructure challenges, Facebook decided to work from above and began testing high-altitude, solar-powered drones, designed to stay aloft for months at a time, that could produce an internet signal for the people below.

While a June test of the drone was considered a success by Facebook, the The National Transportation Safety Board has announced it is conducting an investigation into 'substantial' problems that occurred during the flight.

Facebook is investigating too, according to a blog post. “We are still analyzing the results of the extended test, including a structural failure we experienced just before landing,” wrote the team.

This is only the latest in a number of setbacks Facebook has encountered while trying to connect the entire world.

A satellite that would have beamed internet down over Africa was destroyed in September in when the SpaceX rocket meant to lift the satellite into orbit exploded before liftoff.

There has also been political pushback to Facebook’s initiative, particularly in India, where locals see it not as a charitable project, but as a land-grab of the Indian internet market, Bloomberg reports.

But Facebook does not seem discouraged. The company's a statement on the investigation emphasized the positive outcomes of the test flight, and at an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Peru, Zuckerberg reiterated his commitment to global internet access.

"If we make the right investments now, we can connect billions of people in the next decade and lead the way for our generation to do great things," Zuckerberg said in a Facebook post from the summit on Saturday.

Material from Reuters contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.