Are driver selfies a step forward for Uber safety?

The company says the selfies will make Uber travel more secure, but critics believe real safety calls for greater use of traditional security methods, such as fingerprinting and background checks.

Diane Bondareff/Invision for Mattel/AP
Fred Fontes Gerards takes a selfie after taking a free Uber ride in a Hot Wheels Star Wars First Order Stormtrooper Dodge vehicle in 2015. The company is now using driver selfies as a security tool.

When it comes to safety, Uber says the company is looking to “prevent issues before they even happen.” The latest tool in their arsenal? The driver selfie.

Uber has partnered with Microsoft Cognitive Services to develop the technology, which periodically prompts drivers to take a photo of themselves before getting behind the wheel. Real-Time ID check, as the program is known, then compares the photo to the driver’s Uber profile picture. If the two don’t match, the driver’s account is temporarily frozen while the company investigates. 

The company is touting the program as one in a series of innovations designed to make Uber travel more secure for riders. But critics wonder what’s behind the push to get drivers taking selfies, saying that many drivers have never undergone background checks, and Uber has also resisted fingerprinting.

"This is Uber acknowledging drivers share their accounts and the company’s effort to reduce this practice," David Sutton, a spokesperson for the “Who’s Driving You?” campaign run by the Taxicab, Limousine and Paratransit Association, wrote in an email to The Verge.

Uber admits that passengers are sometimes picked up by drivers who are not the account holder, often a family member or close friend, according to The Washington Post. Such incidents may raise concerns for users about the security of the ride, and Uber is keen to ensure that the right drivers are behind the wheel.

We want to discourage [account sharing], we want the real account owner to know that’s not a good thing,” Joe Sullivan, Uber’s chief security officer, told The Washington Post in an interview before “Real-time ID Check” was rolled out nationwide.

Drivers shouldn't be concerned about photo collection, said Microsoft Corporate Vice President Andrew Shuman. He explained that the photos are safely collected and stored. “We use the photos to improve the algorithms, but we make sure they’re completely anonymized and stripped of any metadata like that.”

Features such as glasses detection were developed during the pilot, which took place in Los Angeles, New York, Miami, and Atlanta. In 99 percent of cases, the technology caused no problems, Uber says.

The company has faced media scrutiny – and legal action – over its safety procedures. In February, Uber announced that it would pay $28.5 million in two class action lawsuits, following claims that it misrepresented its background checks. 

Uber was “glad to put these cases behind us,” according to a company statement. The company committed to “invest in new technology and great customer services so that we can help improve safety in the cities we serve.”

Previous efforts to improve rider safety have included giving riders identifying details about the car and driver to prevent confusion, including a photo of the driver, and a map that can share journeys with friends and family. Uber also recently introduced GPS technology to detect dangerous driving.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Are driver selfies a step forward for Uber safety?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today