Narcissism or empowerment? 1.2 billion selfies taken in Britain in 2014

One study found that men who posted more online photos of themselves than others scored higher on measures of narcissism and psychopathy. 

Ed Crisostomo/The Orange County Register via AP
Erica Goodman, from left, 18, Lennon Moore, 14, and Julia Goodman, 14, all of San Diego take a selfie during the 6th annual VidCon held at Anaheim Convention Center Thursday, July 23, 2015, in Anaheim, Calif.

Selfies. We love them, we hate them, and we rarely admit that we take them.

But if we’re being honest, we all have a few on our camera rolls. A recent report from Ofcom, a British-based communications regulator, found that an estimated 1.2 billion selfies were taken in Britain in 2014. Nearly a third of British adults admitted to taking a selfie, with one in 10 doing so at least once a week in a sample size of 3,756.

With a tap of a screen or the touch of a button you can capture yourself grinning from ear to ear, looking moodily into the distance, or popping a classic “duck face.” Instagram users unabashedly share their selfies with the world, using hashtags like #nofilter to promote natural beauty. The hashtag #selfie alone has over 300 million posts.

Are we learning to love ourselves through the lens of a camera, or are we bordering on narcissism?

A January study by Ohio State University found that men who posted more online photos of themselves than others scored higher on measures of narcissism and psychopathy. Lead author Jesse Fox talked about the findings in a news release.

“It’s not surprising that men who post a lot of selfies and spend more time editing them are more narcissistic, but this is the first time it has actually been confirmed in a study,” said Dr. Fox. “The more interesting finding is that they also score higher on this other anti-social personality trait, psychopathy, and are more prone to self-objectification.”

She adds that the research applies to women and that women who post more selfies also show higher levels of narcissism and psychopathy. She describes it as self-objectification.

“[Selfies] may make people objectify themselves even more,” Fox said.

In a 2013 article posted on Psychology Today, Dr. Peggy Drexler said, “It’s like looking in the mirror all day long, and letting others see you do it.” She adds that this can have serious implications and adversely affect your relationships.

But others see the selfie as an empowering digital tool. For artist Molly Soda, selfies are about more than vanity. She spoke about it in a July interview with National Public Radio.

“I think a selfie is a really, really positive thing ... [I]t’s [a] super positive affirmation of self-love. And taking your photo and putting it on the Internet for the world to see is an act of positivity,” said Ms. Soda.

“When I’m scrolling on my Instagram and I see a photo of a girl that she took of herself and I know she’s feeling really good that day about herself, that makes me feel good and makes me want to photograph myself, and I think it’s a chain reaction.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.