Enough with the bison selfies at Yellowstone, says National Park Service

A woman attacked by a bison at Yellowstone National Park is the fifth person injured in an encounter with the animals this summer.

Robert Graves/AP Photo/File
Bison graze near a stream in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming on June 19, 2014. A woman was injured in a run-in with a bison at the park Tuesday, the latest in a series of encounters between tourists and the animals this season. The National Park Service has implored visitors to keep their distance from large animals.

Stop taking selfies with the bison, please.

The request is implied in a notice published Wednesday by the National Park Service (NPS), imploring park visitors to keep their distance from wildlife, no matter how calm the animals seem.

The notice details an incident involving a mother who was injured by bison at Yellowstone National Park Tuesday after she and her daughter turned their backs on one of the animals to take a picture. The attack makes the woman the fifth person injured in an encounter with bison this summer – and the latest in a growing list of people around the world who have been hurt or killed for the sake of a good selfie.

“The woman and her daughter were by the trailhead sign when they decided to take a picture with a bison that was approximately 6 yards away from them near the trail,” the NPS notice reads. Park regulations instruct visitors to stay at least 25 yards away from all large animals. 

“They heard the bison’s footsteps moving toward them and started to run, but the bison caught the mother on the right side, lifted her up and tossed her with its head,” the notice continues.

The woman was treated at an onsite clinic and released with minor injuries. But not everyone has fared so well.  

In August last year, a Mexican man died trying to take a selfie with a .45 caliber gun – while drunk. That same month, a Polish couple attempting to snap a photo at the Cabo da Roca cliffs in Portugal died when they slipped and fell into the Atlantic Ocean.

As selfies proliferate across social media, more people have fallen victim to the temptation to take a good picture despite the risks involved. In a telling snapshot of how bad it’s become, the Russian government in early July launched a “safe selfies” campaign in the hopes of preventing young people from dying for a good photo, The Christian Science Monitor’s Gretel Kauffman reported.

The campaign followed a series of fatal selfie-related incidents, including a young woman who fell to her death taking a selfie on a bridge, and a Moscow woman who accidentally shot herself in the head while posing with a gun in May.

“Even a million ‘likes’ on social media are not worth your life and well-being,” according to the campaign’s motto.

The statement seems obvious. So why do people keep doing it?

“There’s this general phenomenon where we raise the bar for ourselves of what would be a fun selfie to take and share with others,” Zlatan Krizan, an associate professor of psychology at Iowa State University, told LiveScience. “Nobody wants to be outdone.”

The phenomenon is linked to the concept of social comparison, by which people determine their personal and social worth based on how they stack up to others, Prof. Krizan said.

Though the theory was developed in 1954, it has some very real applications today, especially online: A selfie proves that a person was in a particular place, doing interesting things, said Krizan. And as the standard rises for what is considered interesting, he added, the level of risk that people are willing to take for a potentially impressive may also go up.

Case in point: Following the New York Times report on the woman who was injured by bison at Yellowstone, readers showed they were unfazed by the warning.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.