How Twitter is crowdsourcing its war on trolls

With the launch of a new feature, Twitter is now making it easier to divide, conquer, and… block.

Dado Ruvic/Reuters
Twitter announced its new feature Wednesday, which will allow users to collectively block accounts.

Twitter users have a new weapon in the fight against unwelcome and abusive tweets.

On Wednesday, the social media giant announced a new feature that allows users to export their lists of blocked accounts. Instead of having to block each individual troll, bully, or spambot as their tweets arrive, users will be able to collectively block contacts simply by sharing a downloadable file.

The tool, which is currently available only to some users and will continue to be rolled out over the next few weeks, will most benefit “people that are members of a targeted community,” says Neal Schaffer, co-founder of the Social Tools Summit and a consultant who has been named on Forbes’ list of  Top 50 Social Media Power Influencers.

Mr. Schaffer gives examples of political pundits or sports superfans, such as the actress Ashley Judd, who in March  was berated on Twitter for rooting for the University of Kentucky's basketball team. But ordinary people, like the two dozen high school students in Winchendon, Mass., who were being cyberbullied by two anonymous Twitter accounts in February, would also be able to take advantage of this feature.

Because Twitter users tend to block others for various reasons, however, it’s unclear whether the function is too narrow, says Schaffer. Cyberbullies often target individuals, and people may want to filter out different kinds of advertisements. “I’m not sure that one person’s block list will be as relevant as another.”

Another challenge Twitter faces is the “endless numbers of bots that are in the system,” says Schaffer, which can automatically post tweets and follow other users. “The challenge they have is that they really have little control," he says. "Anyone with an email account can make a Twitter account.”

To limit spam, Schaffer envisions another solution: one that would allow blocked lists to be publicly accessible. “That would help users better filter through… see how many accounts are on x number of blocked lists,” he says, echoing a sentiment that has been expressed by other users. “I do think that the primary benefit is to help users clean up their Twitter stream.”

Twitter’s latest move comes as another step toward guarding privacy as social media continues to brim with virtual communities that actively gather to promote hate. The day after Twitter's announcement, the popular message board website Reddit took to its own network to delete and ban five such communities, including one named “r/fatpeoplehate,” which was regularly posting photos of overweight people and mocking them. It had 150,000 subscribers, about the same as the main Reddit community devoted to bicycling.

The fight against personal harassment by social media companies is proceeding slowly but surely, says Schaffer. Only last year, 12 years after its inception, did LinkedIn introduce a blocking function, he pointed out.

While the success of Twitter’s new feature remains to be seen, “if this raises enough noise, the other social networks may follow suit,” he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.