CSMonitor editors share their favorite people to follow on Twitter

Twitter turned 7 this week. In celebration of the social network's birthday, The Christian Science Monitor compiled a list of favorite Twitter accounts. Each is informative and useful in its own way. Find out what each section recommends for you.

1. International: Joshua Foust and C. Christine Fair

Joshua Foust on Twitter

With more than 200 million active users on Twitter, it can be difficult to track down the most insightful voices on international news and politics.

The Monitor’s International section recommends two users, Joshua Foust and C. Christine Fair, for those who want critical perspectives on what's going on in the world.

Mr. Foust is an analyst who focuses on international security and intelligence issues. He contributes to PBS and The Atlantic, among other publications.

On Twitter, Foust is constantly engaged in conversations about international security, especially in relation to Asia. He not only tweets blog posts, but also weighs in on issues addressed in other articles to more than 10,000 followers.

Asia editor Jenna Fisher (@AsiaJenna) says Foust often has solid insight on Afghanistan and Central Asia.

“He retweets thoughtful articles and is an active, critical thinker on all things counterterrorism and foreign policy,” she says.

Ms. Fair, an assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies, offers her thoughts on South Asian political and military affairs. She has also worked as a senior political scientist with the RAND Corporation, a political officer to the U.N. Assistance Mission to Afghanistan in Kabul, and as a senior research associate in the United States Institute of Peace’s Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention, according to the university website.

Fair has more than 11,000 followers on Twitter. She tweets mainly about South Asian politics and military issues, but she also offers insight on gun control and women’s rights in the US military. Occasionally, you’ll find a few food- or pet-related tweets too.

“At a time when political and military affairs in South Asia can feel cryptic, she raises a lot of good questions and helps peel back the layers of what’s happening,” Ms. Fisher says.

1 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.