5 foreign companies that are beating Silicon Valley at its own game

5. India: Zomato vs Yelp

Screenshot 1/22/15
India-based restaurant discovery website Zomato is poised to give Yelp a run for its money.

What is Zomato? There is only one thing people like more than eating food, and that is making sure they are eating the best food possible. That is why restaurant review websites such as Yelp and UrbanSpoon have flourished. India is no different. But it appears Zomato, its most popular restaurant discovery site, has an appetite bigger than the South Asian nation of more than 1 billion.

Zomato started as Foodiebay in 2008 (but decided to change the name as not to be confused with eBay). At first, it marketed itself as a restaurant and events website, but soon dropped the events aspect to focus on food full time. In short, Zomato is a “restaurant discovery” website, meaning it has listings for restaurants across a city along with a rating and categorization system. It relies less on the social aspect of restaurant reviewing; it works with restaurants and its own team of researchers to ensure menu and hours-of-operation information are up to date. Users can find restaurants, leave reviews, rate a restaurant, and keep their own restaurant diary to share with friends.

Why will it beat Yelp? Currently, Zomato is at a fraction of the revenue of Yelp ($6 million in revenue compared to Yelp’s $232 million last year), but it has some serious ambition. Though four years younger than Yelp, it operates in 19 countries that tend to be developing economies (as opposed to Yelp, which operates in 23 countries though they are mostly developed nations), hitting nascent markets as they grow. Though it is overwhelmingly popular in its home country India, in the past year it has gobbled up foodie websites across the world, including in the Czech Republic, Poland, New Zealand, and Italy. In January 2015, it announced it bought Seattle-based UrbanSpoon. Zomato hopes its more carefully curated content will be enough to satiate appetites even outside its native land.

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.