FTC turns crosshairs on text message spammers

The Federal Trade Commission has filed complaints against 29 defendants, who sent a total of 180 million ‘unwanted’ and ‘deceptive’ texts, the FTC says.

Reuters
An employee holds the Apple iPhone 4s and Samsung's Galaxy S III at a store in Seoul in this file photo from August 24, 2012.

Text spam hasn’t yet reached the plague-like proportions of old-fashioned email spam. Still, it’s a pain in the neck, and it’s apt to become more of a pain in the neck in years to come – by one estimate, there are more than six billion cellphone subscribers in the world. You think advertisers and ne'er-do-wells are going to leave that kind of massive target audience alone? (Answer: no.)

So three cheers to the Federal Trade Commission, which says it will begin aggressively pursuing text-spamming marketers that run afoul of US law. This week, the agency filed eight complaints against 29 defendants, all of whom are charged with sending 180 million “unwanted” texts.

Those texts, the FTC says, promised the recipients gift cards to outlets such as Best Buy and Target. But if you clicked on the embedded link, you were brought to a page and asked to type in your credit card information before you could get your hands on the gift cards. Needless to say, it was all a high-tech hustle.  

"Today's announcement says ‘game over’ to the major league scam artists behind millions of spam texts," Charles Harwood, acting director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, says in a statement. "The FTC is committed to rooting out this deception and stopping it.  For consumers who find spam texts on their phones, delete them, immediately. The offers are, in a word, garbage."

It’s worth noting that the FTC can not immediately halt this kind of practice – only a federal court can do that. So until the eight complaints are adjudicated, just be careful not to click too wantonly on the link embedded inside a mysterious text message. You never know where it might lead.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.