How does this polka dot tree frog glow in the dark?

Some of the molecules in its skin are unique among known fluorescent animals.

Julian Faivoivich and Carlos Taboada/Nature
The South American polka dot tree frog (Hypsiboas punctatus) can change its skin from a muted palette of greens, yellows, and reds to a bright blue and green glow under dim light.

At first glance, the South American polka dot tree frog gives off a pale, brownish-green hue. But under a fluorescent light, it glows bright green, with 18 percent of a full moon’s light.

In a study published Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a team of Argentinian and Brazilian researchers attribute this phenomenon, known as fluorescence, to compounds secreted by the frog’s skin and lymph glands. They see their finding as a major step forward for our understanding of amphibians.

“We were not expecting this bio-fluorescence,” study co-author Norberto Peporine Lopes told Chemistry World. “It was an incredible surprise.”

Unlike bioluminescent animals, like fireflies and anglerfish, which generate their own light, fluorescent animals absorb light and re-emit it at a longer wavelength. Scientists had seen this phenomenon at work in sharks, sea turtles, and other species, but never in amphibians.

When the researchers set out to investigate the polka dot tree frog’s pigment, they thought they might find red fluorescence. The frogs contain a chemical called biliverdin, which has been known to bond to proteins and help some insects fluoresce red.

But the frog, known as Hypsiboas punctatus to scientists, instead glowed green under the researchers’ blacklight. “We couldn’t believe it,” another team member, herpetologist Julián Faivovich, told Nature.

Further investigation found that three molecules – hyloin-L1, hyloin-L2 and hyloin-G1 – were responsible for the phenomenon. Dr. Lopes, a chemist at Brazil’s University of São Paulo, told Nature that these molecules are unique among known fluorescent animals.

What purpose could these molecules serve? Scientists are now gearing up to answer that question. Bibiana Rojas, an ecologist at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland, told Chemistry World that “it would be interesting to investigate if [fluorescence] has a role in species recognition, or whether it facilitates the formation of couples.”

“Fluorescence would be potentially very useful in a noisy environment and in a habitat with dense foliage, as it would make individuals brighter,” she continued.

While the threats facing frogs are well documented, scientists keep identifying new strategies they may have for adapting and thriving in a wide range of environments. Last month, The Christian Science Monitor reported the discovery of several new species of “miniature” frogs, whose tiny bodies may have evolved in response to a limited food supply.

It’s too early to know definitively why South America’s frogs evolved fluorescence, and whether South America’s 250 other translucent-skinned tree frogs also have the trait. But Dr. Faivovich is eager to find out.

“I'm really hoping that other colleagues will be very interested in this phenomenon,” he told Nature, “and they will start carrying a UV flashlight to the field.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.