Did the asteroid that did in the dinos drive up a temporary Mt. Everest?

A new study finds that the impact of the asteroid was so powerful that it caused rock in the Earth's crust to act like liquid.

NASA/JPL/NGA/File
The topography of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula reveals a subtle, but unmistakable, indication of the Chicxulub asteroid impact crater, believed by many scientists to be the cause of a mass extinction event 65 million years ago. In this computer-enhanced image, the crater's outer boundary is visible as the semi-circular, darker green line in the peninsula's upper left corner: a trough only 3 to 5 meters (10 to 15 feet) deep and 5 kilometers (3 miles) wide.

When an asteroid collided into Earth some 66 million years ago, wiping out the dinosaurs, it left a crater just off the coast of Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula, where it struck. By drilling down into the “peak ring,” or the innermost ridge of rock tossed up by the impact, scientists say they’ve reached surprising conclusions about how the collision unfolded.

Researchers from more than a dozen countries found that the force of the impact splashed up rock from deep beneath the Earth's crust, bringing it to the surface, results published Friday in the journal Science. 

“These rocks behaved like a fluid for a short period of time, and rocks don’t tend to do that,” Imperial College London geophysicist Joanna Morgan, who co-led the team, told The New York Times. “It’s a very dramatic process when you form a large crater.”

The study confirms the team’s unusual model for how craters form during powerful collisions: Over the course of a few minutes, a mountain of debris higher than Everest piled up, then collapsed again into a chain of smaller peaks, Dr. Morgan told the BBC. The Chicxulub crater, as it’s known, is the only preserved structure of its kind on Earth, making the team’s model useful in application to research into craters on the moon, and on other planets. And they also think their findings could help scientists better understand how the asteroid’s impact unleashed a cataclysmic change in the climate. 

Funded with $10 million from the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) and the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program, the study posed several logistical challenges. About 66 million years’ worth of sediment blankets the crater. Rainforest covers the part that's now dry land, with the other part – including the center – lying below the Gulf of Mexico. That means the drilling took place offshore, as The Christian Science Monitor’s Ben Thompson wrote back in March, while the team prepared to launch their expedition: 

A specialized IODP boat outfitted with three large pylons will sail from the Yucatán coast this April to an offshore location above a peak ring. There, the pylons will be lowered into the rock and the boat will lift up and out of the water to form a stable drilling platform from which the IODP team will send a diamond-tipped bit nearly 1 mile deep into the peak ring to drill and extract rock over the course of the two-month expedition.

After drilling through some 60 feet of water and 2,000 feet of earth, the team kept pulling up samples of limestone and brecchia, or fragments of melted rock, before finally hitting paydirt, according to Sean Gulick, a co-lead author and a marine geophysicist at the University of Texas at Austin.

“It was limestone, limestone, limestone, breccia. And then suddenly pink granite!” Dr. Gulick told The New York Times. “It was exhilarating, it looks like your classic pink granite countertop.”

But the granite also showed signs of intense stress, with deformations and fractures visible to the naked eye.

“That was the big find because that says that this peak ring didn’t come from something shallow at all,” he added. “It had to come from deep because it’s made of deeply buried crustal rocks now at the surface.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.