Is the moon contributing to earthquakes?

A new study supports the theory that the moon's gravitational pull can contribute to earthquakes.

Julio Cortez/AP/File
A full moon rises over the Statue of Liberty seen from the Port Liberte neighborhood of Jersey City, N.J., Monday, Feb. 22, 2016.

Scientists and conspiracy theorists alike have suspected that the moon may cause (or at least contribute to) earthquakes – and now they have data.

A study, published Monday in Nature Geoscience by Satoshi Ide, a seismologist at the University of Tokyo, links extreme high tides with several recent high-magnitude earthquakes, suggesting that just as the moon’s gravitational pull moves the oceans, it can also put pressure on sensitive fault lines in the Earth’s crust.

"We find that very large earthquakes, including the 2004 Sumatran, 2010 Maule earthquake in Chile, and the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake in Japan, tend to occur near the time of maximum tidal stress amplitude," the study authors wrote. "This tendency is not obvious for small earthquakes. However, we also find that the fraction of large earthquakes increases ... as the amplitude of tidal shear stress increases."

The Earth's tides, which rise and fall twice each day, are controlled by the moon's and the sun's gravitational pulls on the water. Twice a month, at the new and full moon, the high tides are at their most extreme because the aligned sun and moon exert their gravitational tug on the oceans in the same plane. This phenomenon is called a "spring tide."

To measure the stress that the moon and sun exert on fault lines, Dr. Ide collected high tide times for two weeks prior to many major earthquakes over the past two decades, and used it to calculate the tidal amplitude.

With this data in hand, he and his colleagues determined that "the probability of a tiny rock failure expanding to a gigantic rupture increases with increasing tidal stress levels."

The research suggests correlation, not causation. Tides simply add to the stress present at fault lines because of shifting tectonic plates.

"We know from studying rock friction in the laboratory that the fault does not go from locked up to sliding in an instant. It can take hours, days, or even longer for the fault to really come un-glued, even when the stress has exceeded the supposed strength," Nicholas van der Elst, a seismologist with the US Geological Survey, told The Atlantic.

The new study looked only at high-magnitude earthquakes, but Dr. van der Elst published a study in July that looked into low-frequency earthquakes. He found that at the San Andreas fault, these tremors were more likely to occur during the moon's waxing phase, when the tides change fastest.

The authors of the new study suggested that their research could help predict future earthquakes, particularly in vulnerable areas, but others are not so sure.

"Scientists will find this result, if confirmed, quite interesting," said University of Washington seismologist John Vidale, who was not part of the study, reported USA Today. "Even if there is a strong correlation of big earthquakes with full or new moons, the chance any given week of a deadly earthquake remains miniscule."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.