Luca 'the ancestor of all living things,' say scientists

Scientists have generated a genetic portrait of a four-billion-year-old organism that they say may be the oldest common ancestor of all living things. 

Courtesy of Volcanoes of the Deep Sea/Rutgers University
Scientists speculate that Luca, a four-billion-year-old organism, may have originated in a hydrothermal vent.

What do humans, insects, and algae all have in common? Very little, except for Luca.

Evolutionary biologists have revealed a detailed genetic profile of Luca, the Last Universal Common Ancestor of all living things. A new study, published Monday in the journal Nature Microbiology, provides insight into where and how this ancient precursor may have lived.

There are three basic types of living organisms on Earth: eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea. Eukaryotes include all plants and animals. Bacteria and archaea are both single-celled, asexual organisms with no nucleus or organelles, but have distinct genetic and biochemical backgrounds.

Researchers say that all three groups can be traced back to Luca, a single-celled organism that lived around 4 billion years ago. It is commonly thought that Luca’s descendants diverged into bacteria and archaea, and that eukaryotes emerged later. The ancestor’s physiology and habitat were mostly left to speculation, until now.

A group of evolutionary biologists, led by William Martin of Heinrich Heine University in Germany, set out to create a genetic profile of Luca. Dr. Martin and colleagues compared protein-coding genes in both bacteria and archaea, eventually identifying 355 genes that likely originated in Luca. Among them, they found a gene that codes for an enzyme called reverse gyrase, which is only found in extremophile microbes.

“I was flabbergasted at the result,” Martin told The New York Times. “I couldn’t believe it.”

Luca’s genes suggest that the organism lived in extremely hot deep-sea vents, metabolizing hydrogen gas for energy. Some scientists have postulated that life itself originated in this type of environment. Martin has argued that Luca may not just be the common ancestor, but one of the very first living organisms.

Scientists have long racked their brains trying to understand how life arose from nonliving organic materials. Some say life began in a “primordial soup” of warm water and basic chemicals. In 2013, Cornell researchers suggested that life may have originated in clay.

John Sutherland, a chemist at the University of Cambridge, has argued that ultraviolet light is an essential energy source for life-originating chemical reactions. Ultraviolet light comes from the sun, so by that hypothesis, life must have originated in land-based pools. Luca may have inhabited deep-sea vents, Sutherland says, but life likely originated much earlier.

“We didn’t set out with a preferred scenario,” Sutherland told The New York Times. “We deduced the scenario from the chemistry.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Luca 'the ancestor of all living things,' say scientists
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today