Oxygen in Martian atmosphere? Yes, but don't get too excited yet.

Detection of atomic oxygen in Mars' upper atmosphere is exciting news for scientists, but not in the way you might think.

The planet Mars is seen in a 2003 image from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope.

There's atomic oxygen in Mars' upper atmosphere, say NASA scientists

That doesn't mean there's life down on the surface of the Red Planet. Atomic oxygen is not the same thing as the oxygen we breathe. The oxygen that we survive on is two oxygen atoms linked to form O2 , while atomic oxygen is a single oxygen atom.

But atomic oxygen does a play key role in the Martian atmosphere, so understanding its abundance could help answer other questions about the Red Planet.

Just about half the amount of oxygen expected was detected, but the scientists suggest that might be explained by variations in the Martian atmosphere.

The researchers detected the atomic oxygen from Earth, from an instrument onboard a Boeing 747SP specially modified to be a sort of flying observatory. The craft, called the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA), flew between 37,000 and 45,000 feet over the Earth, above much of the moisture in our planet's atmosphere that would have blocked the the signals the scientists were looking for.

"Atomic oxygen in the Martian atmosphere is notoriously difficult to measure," Pamela Marcum, SOFIA project scientist, said in a NASA press release. "To observe the far-infrared wavelengths needed to detect atomic oxygen, researchers must be above the majority of Earth’s atmosphere and use highly sensitive instruments, in this case a spectrometer. SOFIA provides both capabilities."

This wasn't the first time scientists have detected atomic oxygen in Mars' atmosphere. Four decades ago the Viking and Mariner missions also made similar measurements.

This atomic oxygen may hold clues into how Mars has changed in the solar system's history. Scientists think the Red Planet wasn't always the cold, rust-colored, dry desert it appears to be today. Instead, researchers have suggested that it was much wetter and perhaps more conducive to microbial life, supported by an oxygen-rich atmosphere.

To explain how Mars changed, some scientists have proposed that the atmosphere eroded over time, perhaps thanks to strong solar storms and solar winds.

In that explanation, streams of charged particles from the sun would have split water and carbon dioxide molecules into their atomic parts. As separate atoms, it would be more likely that these pieces could hurtle off into space. Hydrogen, the lightest of the bunch, would have floated off most easily. But oxygen that was energized by photochemical reactions could have also been extended away from the planet's gravitational pull enough to be stripped away as well.

Today, "atomic oxygen affects how other gases escape Mars and therefore has a significant impact on the planet’s atmosphere," according to the NASA press release.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.