Case of Mars' mysteriously vanishing atmosphere solved

NASA scientists published research Thursday that explains how the Martian landscape was transformed into a cold, dry desert.

Scientists have long wondered how Mars transformed into the cold, dry desert it is today when it once was very similar to Earth. But NASA published new research Thursday from its Mars-orbiting MAVEN spacecraft that might at last solve this scientific mystery.

Mars’ atmosphere leaks into space at about a half a pound a second. Although this might sound impressive, scientists say that even this rate over the solar system’s 4.5-billion-year history would not be enough to fully erode a thick Earth-like atmosphere.

According to research published in this week’s issue of Science, MAVEN’s data reveals stronger erosion rates of Mars’ atmosphere during solar storms. The "interplanetary coronal mass ejection," also called an aurora, causes “dramatic spikes in the number of oxygen and carbon dioxide ions spewing into space.” 

Jasper Halekas, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Iowa and a member of the MAVEN team, told The New York Times that the solar storm studied in early March “is the equivalent of a tsunami at Mars.”

Because Mars does not have a global magnetic field like Earth, its atmosphere is left unprotected and vulnerable to periodic solar storms from the sun, caused by high-energy blasts of the sun’s gas and solar ultraviolet radiation.

The storms are so powerful, that Professor Halekas said the energy hitting Mars’ atmosphere is comparable to a million tons of TNT an hour, or “one large nuclear weapon per hour, if you like.”

MAVEN scientists say we have Earth’s magnetic field to thank for our aurora-ignorance. 

“What we in hindsight were pretty foolish about was, what Earth’s magnetic field really does is prevent auroras from happening everywhere on Earth,” Dr. Nick Schneider, a planetary scientist at the University of Colorado and a member of the MAVEN team told The Times. 

“We sort of did this dope slap, saying, ‘Well, of course, what’s going to prevent these particles from the sun from slamming into Mars’ atmosphere anywhere and maybe everywhere?’” 

To better understand when Earth-like conditions were present on the Red Planet, scientists with NASA’s MAVEN mission want to understand how much of Mars’ atmosphere has been lost to space, including influence from such solar storms. 

“Solar-wind erosion is an important mechanism for atmospheric loss, and was important enough to account for significant change in the Martian climate,” Joe Grebowsky, a MAVEN project scientist explained in NASA’s press release. “MAVEN also is studying other loss processes – such as loss due to impact of ions or escape of hydrogen atoms – and these will only increase the importance of atmospheric escape.”

This report contains material from Reuters and The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.