Large earthquake likely to strike LA soon, scientists warn

A study has found that there is a 99.9 percent chance that an earthquake of magnitude 5.0 or greater will strike the Greater Los Angeles in the next two and a half years.

JPL
The Los Angeles area is threaded with many buried faults, some of which have never been mapped. A new study suggests that a magnitude 5.0 or greater earthquake on at least one of these faults is virtually a sure thing in the next few years.

The chance of a moderate-size earthquake striking the Los Angeles area soon is almost guaranteed, if a new study is correct.

The Greater Los Angeles area has a 99.9 percent chance of having an earthquake of magnitude 5.0 or greater in the next two and a half years, thanks to several hidden faults that have built up considerable strain, according to a study published Sept. 30 in the journal Earth and Space Science.

But exactly where this next medium-size temblor could strike is less clear, because any one of the many faults that thread through the area could rupture.

"Identifying specific fault structures most likely to be responsible for future earthquakes for this system of many active faults is often very difficult," Andrea Donnellan, a geologist in the Science Division of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, said in a statement. [The 10 Biggest Earthquakes in History]

A whole lot of shaking

The findings are based on the researchers' analysis of the deformation of the ground surface in the L.A. regionthat occurred as a result of the magnitude-5.1 earthquake that struck La Habra, California, in 2014. That temblor caused no injuries, but its shallow depth and epicenter in a dense, urban region resulted in $12 million in damages.

After the quake, geologists analyzed how the crust had deformed. To do so, they used several tools, including GPS data from the Plate Boundary Observatory and radar measurements taken from a plane using an instrument called Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR). UAVSAR detects teeny shifts in the Earth's surface as the plane flies above.

The measurements revealed that the La Habra temblor caused more surface deformation than should be expected from a magnitude-5.1 earthquake. In fact, almost one-fifth of the deformation occurred without causing any ground shaking. That suggests that even relatively small-magnitude earthquakes can destroy water mains or cause other structural problems far away from the heart of the earthquake, the researchers said.

Network of faults

The team also used computer models to better understand exactly how the ground deformation occurred. They deduced that shallow movement along several buried faults in the earth in both Los Angeles and the surrounding counties had caused the ground movement.

In particular, the researchers focused on the faults running through the region's San Gabriel Valley (which lies east of L.A.) and Chino Hills (a suburb of the city located in San Bernardino County). These faults are threaded into a network, and not all of them have been mapped.

The new measurements suggest that some of those faults are still locked together, producing strain that could trigger the next earthquake. A magnitude 6.1 to 6.3 earthquake would relieve that accumulated strain, the study found.

Because the earthquake faults in this region are part of a system, "they can move together in an earthquake, and produce measurable surface deformation, even during moderate-magnitude earthquakes," Donnellan said. "This fault system accommodates the ongoing shortening of Earth's crust in the northern Los Angeles region," she said.

However, not every model says a decent-size earthquake is a sure thing for the Los Angeles area in the immediate future. The U.S. Geological Survey, which uses different models than the one the researchers used, puts the chance of an earthquake of magnitude 5 or greater in this area in three years at 85 percent, according to the agency's Facebook page.

But whether there's an 85 or 99.9 percent chance of a big quake, it's probably not a bad idea for Angelenos to have their earthquake kits and disaster plans ready.

Follow Tia Ghose on Twitterand Google+. Follow Live Science @livescienceFacebook Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.