Do you live in an area prone to quakes? You might be surprised.

Almost half of all Americans live in earthquake-prone areas, says the USGS, because of population growth and an increase in 'induced earthquakes' far from fault zones.

Courtesy of the USGS
USGS map showing the intensity of potential earthquake ground shaking that has a 2 percent chance of occurring in 50 years. Red areas have the highest risk, blue areas the lowest risk.
John Torrisi/University of Nevada, Reno via AP
This undated photo provided by the University of Nevada Reno, shows an earthquake sensor placed by scientists from UNR's Nevada Seismological Laboratory in and around the Sheldon Wildlife Refuge near Gerlach, Nev.

The number of earthquakes shaking the US has been on the rise in recent decades, and now nearly half of all Americans now live in earthquake-prone areas, according to a recent study by the US Geological Survey (USGS) published in the journal Earthquake Spectra.

More 143 million people in the 48 contiguous states are likely to face "potentially damaging ground shaking" caused by earthquakes, and after adding those living in vulnerable regions in Alaska, Hawaii, and the US territories, this number rises to about half of all Americans.

"The new exposure estimate is nearly double the previous 2006 estimate of 75 million Americans in 39 states, and is attributed to both population growth and advances in science," said William Leith, the USGS senior science advisor for earthquake and geologic hazards and a co-author of the study.

"Populations have grown significantly in areas prone to earthquakes, and USGS scientists have improved data and methodologies that allow for more accurate estimates of earthquake hazards and ground shaking."

The USGS found that approximately 57 million people live or work in areas where the kind of shaking that destroys buildings can be expected to happen at "moderately frequent intervals," or once every 475 years. This translates into a 10 percent probability of occurring within 50 years.

According to the study, 28 million people live in locations with building-destroying quakes expected at "relatively frequent intervals," with a 50 percent probability over 50 years.

Scientists came up with these estimates by considering the likelihood of an earthquake happening within a 50-year time frame, the typical lifetime of a building before it becomes unsafe. They also looked at recently updated US National Seismic Hazard Maps that predict the location, frequency, and intensity of future earthquakes.  

So who faces the highest risks? 

The west coast, the "intermontane" region between the Sierras and the Rockies, and several "active" regions of the central and eastern US are particularly susceptible to earthquake hazards, the researchers say. The 10 most populated states prone to very strong quakes are California, Washington, Utah, Tennessee, Oregon, South Carolina, Nevada, Arkansas, Missouri, and Illinois. 

The USGS says several factors influence the severity and aftermath of an earthquake, including the location of fault lines and an area’s seismicity rates. While most quakes won’t lead to intense shaking, the ones that do "could cause significant damage and casualties," say USGS scientists.

"Of particular concern is the significant amount of critical infrastructure located in high earthquake-hazard areas, ranging from private and public schools to health care facilities and fire stations," said Kishor Jaiswal, a USGS research structural engineer and lead author of the study. 

Central and eastern states have seen a sharp rise in earthquakes over the past few years, note scientists. 

Between 1973 and 2008, the region experienced about 21 earthquakes per year with magnitudes of three or higher, according to the USGS. That rate rose to an average of 99 quakes per year in 2009-2013, and is likely to soar in the near future – 2014 alone saw 659 magnitude-three or higher earthquakes.

The spike is due to a rise in "induced" earthquakes, say USGS scientists, meaning quakes caused by human activity – usually fracking, enhanced oil recovery, saltwater disposal, or wastewater injections. Two April studies found that typically dormant areas, far from fault lines, have become exposed to these “man-made earthquakes,” as The Christian Science Monitor's Henry Gass reported at the time.

In line with those findings, two studies published in June found that “high-rate injection wells,” those that injected more than 300,000 barrels per month into the ground, have also contributed to the skyrocketing rates of earthquakes.

Of course, not all fracking sites or injection wells shake the ground enough to notice, note Justin L. Rubinstein and Alireza Babaie Mahani, with the USGS and the Geological Survey of Canada, respectively. 

"Most injection wells do not cause felt earthquakes," they wrote in June. "There are approximately 35,000 active wastewater disposal wells, 80,000 active enhanced oil-recovery wells, and tens of thousands of wells are hydraulically fractured every year in the United States. Only a few dozen of these wells are known to have induced felt earthquakes."

Fracking gets a disproportionate share of they blame, they argue. "Wastewater injection is associated with all of the largest injection-induced earthquakes," they write. Even though the US has approximately 30 times as many fracking wells as wastewater disposal wells, the US has had "only three reported cases of hydraulic fracturing-induced earthquakes ... and only a few more worldwide," they note.

"This new research helps us better understand the scale of earthquake hazards," says the USGS's Dr. Jaiswal, "and ultimately strengthen the nation’s ability to protect Americans against future events."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Do you live in an area prone to quakes? You might be surprised.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today