After three decades, is Chernobyl now a haven for wildlife?

Nearly 30 years after the Ukraine nuclear disaster that forced thousands of people from their homes researchers find the animals are back - and thriving. 

Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
Wild boar run through a former village in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
An abandoned house sits in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Tom Hinton
This gate is an entry-point for the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.

When a reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine exploded on April 26, 1986, radioactive dust settled over thousands of miles. The next day some 116,000 people were evacuated, thinking they would return home just days later. They never did. 

Now nearly 30 years later, villages and cities in the 1,600-square-mile exclusion zone sit empty. Pripyat, once a city of 50,000 nearby Chernobyl, is a crumbling ghost town.

But the zone isn’t truly empty. In the absence of humans, the animals seem to have taken over, say researchers.

The overgrown exclusion zone is teeming with animals. Populations of animals such as wild boar, roe deer, and wolves have rebounded immensely, according to a study published Monday in the journal Current Biology

Humans leaving the area could have been the best thing for these animals, says study author Jim Smith of the University of Portsmouth in the UK. “That’s not saying radiation is good for animals, but human habitation, occupation, agriculture, forestry is worse,” he says in an interview.

The exclusion zone, the region evacuated following the Chernobyl fire and explosion, stretches across the border of Ukraine and Belarus. The data used in this study comes from the Polessye State Radioecological Reserve in Belarus, which encompasses about half of the exclusion zone. 

Researchers at the reserve counted elk, wild boar, and roe deer from helicopter flights throughout 1987 and 1996. They saw the population of these large mammals grow dramatically in the years immediately following the nuclear disaster. 

For example, says Dr. Smith, “The wild boar initially increase very rapidly in population numbers. That was due to the good conditions for them. The people had moved out, they were recolonizing the area, there was abundant food supplies.”

The boar picked up where the people had left off, in a way. “There were crops left, orchards, vegetable gardens and so on,” Smith says. “There’s evidence of [the boar] occupying the villages and the farms in the area. Ironically, some of the farm buildings where the pigs used to stay, they were moving back in.”

Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
Wild boar have taken over fields and other space abandoned by humans in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.

As part of the study, researchers compared the abundance of certain mammals in Chernobyl to those in other nature preserves in Belarus. They found that Chernobyl held just as many of these animals as the other protected sites. 

In fact, there were more wolves in Chernobyl than in the other reserves. Smith suggests that with much less human traffic and more distance from human communities the wolves have seen less hunting and other threats.

Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
A wolf runs through the snow in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. Researcher Dr. Jim Smith says wolves have thrived in the zone in the absence of hunters and other human activity.

Other researchers have found animals, like wild boar, as far away as Germany to be radioactive decades after the nuclear explosion. But Smith doesn’t think the contamination is significantly influencing the size of these animals’ populations. 

Smith looked at data from snow-track surveys gathered from 2008 to 2010 by the Belarusian researchers. “There are 35 routes, each of about 9 kilometers, where they count the number of animal tracks. Those pretty much cover the whole of the exclusion zone in Belarus,” he says.

Smith says, “We mapped out those routes and worked out the radioactive contamination density on each of those routes to see, once we’ve accounted for different habitat along the routes, can we see an influence of the radioactive contamination on the number of tracks we’re counting. And we couldn’t.”

Sure, some individual animals could be affected by the remaining radioactive hotspots, but on an overall population level the animals seem to be thriving, says Smith.

“We’re not saying radiation is good for them. We’re also not saying that there aren’t some individual level effects. There might be,” he says. But “We’ve looked at the population and we don’t see an effect.”

Check out more pictures of animals spotted in the exclusion zone:

Courtesy of Valeriy Lukashevitch
Lynx were not seen in the zone until recently, according to Dr. Jim Smith.
Courtesy of Tatyana Deryabina
Roe deer have rebounded in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
A family of elk roams in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. This animal, Alces alces, is a 'moose' in North America.
Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
A weasel peeks out in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
Two baby spotted eagles in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Tatyana Deryabina
Przhevalski horses in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
Kingfishers share a fish in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Tatyana Deryabina
Two bison in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
Courtesy of Valeriy Yurko
A group of adult and young wild boar run by abandoned buildings in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to After three decades, is Chernobyl now a haven for wildlife?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today