California's Sierra Nevada snowpack shrinks to a 500-year low

The record-low Sierra Nevada snowpack was another indication of the severity of California's drought, which is affecting everything from agriculture to hydropower generation.

(AP Photo/Gregory Bull)
Groves of citrus trees sit below a barren hillside in Tulare County, outside of Porterville, Calif. in July 2015. Farming in Tulare County brought in $7.8 billion in 2013, more than any other county in the nation, according to the agricultural commissioner here. But with little water now from the meager Sierra Nevada snowpack, some farmers are getting only a tiny fraction of their historic surface water, and so are drilling ever-deeper, draining the groundwater.

California's Sierra Nevada mountains haven't had this little snowpack since the days of Christopher Columbus.

That's the finding of a new study released Monday indicating this year the state has seen its lowest snowpack in 500 years, and climate change may cause greater water shortages in the already drought-stricken, wildfire-ravaged state.

This past spring, the mountain range had just 5 percent of the average snowpack recorded in the second half of the 20th century, and scientists said the findings indicated "the 2015 low is unprecedented in the context of the past 500 years."

The study found that the depth of snow at 108 measuring stations in the Sierra Nevada on April 1 was just 2.3 inches in "snow water equivalent" - the depth of the water if the snow melted - against an average 27.5 inches from 1930-2014.

“We were expecting that 2015 would be extreme, but not like this,” said senior study author Valerie Trouet, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Arizona, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.

According to the newspaper, the new research is the latest attempt in a series of studies that seek to find scope and broader context for California’s four-year drought. Snowpack in the Sierra Nevada range, which runs along the spine of the Golden State, provides about 30 percent of California’s annual water supply.

The “low” finding was based on records of snowfall and temperatures gathered from annual growth rings of blue oaks and other trees in the mountain range, resulting in some reservations about extremes in past centuries.

The scientists also said the uncertainties in tree ring data indicated that a few years, mainly in the 16th century, might have had snowpack lows even lower than the 2015 numbers.

Still, the researchers caution the record low is an "ominous sign" of the severity of a historic drought that has plagued the state since 2012. The Sierra Nevada snowpack affects California from utilities to ecosystems, providing hydroelectric power and impacting wildfire risk, the scientists wrote in the journal Nature Climate Change.

"Sierra Nevada snowpack plays a critical role in replenishing the state's water reservoirs and provides 30 percent of its water supply," according to the study, led by the University of Arizona.

Global warming was projected to "further increase the probability of severe drought events," they wrote.

Over the weekend, California governor Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency in two counties where wildfires have rapidly grown, scorching hundreds of homes, and forcing thousands of residents to evacuate.

Ms. Trouet told Reuters there were reasons to believe that man-made warming "played an important role in the 2015 snowpack low" even though such extremes may be just freak natural events.

But there are forecasts that California's drought may ease – at least temporarily – soon. In July, the Climate Prediction Center, a National Weather Service agency, forecast an 80 percent chance that conditions would last through early spring. 

"It definitely would increase the likelihood of heavy rains in the winter there, which would certainly improve their situation tremendously," said Donald Keeney, senior agricultural meteorologist with Maryland-based MDA Weather Services.

California could begin to get increased rainfall as early as October and definitely by November or December, Mr Keeney said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.