McScary mascot: What was McDonald's thinking?

McScary mascot: McDonald's recently unveiled 'Happy,' a grinning red cube that detractors have dubbed 'McScary.' What is the psychology behind corporate mascots? 

McDonalds USA
'Happy,' the McDonalds mascot being introduced to American children this week, has been dubbed 'McScary' by many Twitter users.

The US arrival of McDonalds' new mascot, a grinning red cube named "Happy" who has courted European children for the past five years, has many in the media and Twitterverse wondering: Why? 

"Happy is about bringing more fun and excitement to kids’ meals, including eating wholesome food choices like low-fat yogurt," explained McDonald's in a press release announcing Happy's US debut.

But the collective voice of social media has detected shadows in Happy's golden-arched irises. Fast Company called it "a nightmare creature from a candy-colored death world," whose "oversized chiclet teeth and torso-sized smile can't mask the calculation emanating from its heavy-lidded eyes."

Whatever one's opinion of Happy, which McDonald's says is designed to serve "as an ambassador for balanced and wholesome eating," it seems the fast-food company did its homework. The creature's design hews tidily to two recent findings of marketing science studies, namely, 1) be whimsical but not baby-cute, and 2) make eye contact with consumers.

One study that will be published in the August 2014 Journal of Consumer Research explored different types of "cuteness," based on the understanding that babyish cuteness – products or images with chubby cheeks, or big eyes – cause adults to behave in a more careful, restrained way.

"We were not convinced that all cute products would lead to the restrained behavior that stems from baby-cuteness. Our research examined whether there are indeed different types of cuteness, and if these differences could lead to more or less indulgent behavior," wrote the study's authors.

"Playful and whimsical" stuff, the researchers found, made people indulge themselves more. People ate more ice cream, for example, when give a playful ice cream scoop, than they did with a plain one. The authors believe the finding on food consumption may carry over into over consumer realms.

"Even though we examined the effects of playful products on indulgence in the domains of eating, shopping, and product usage, we expect that exposure to whimsical products could have similar effects on helping people focus on having fun and rewarding themselves in other important life domains like savings, debt repayment, or time management," the authors conclude.

Perhaps Happy's toothy countenance was meant to strike this balance: playful in a disarmingly unbabyish way?

Another forthcoming 2014 study, in the journal Environment and Behavior, found that mascots on cereal boxes are overwhelmingly designed to make eye-contact with shoppers.  Those targeting adults looked straight into their eyes, in fact, and those targeting children looked down upon them, at an angle averaging 9.67 degrees.

The researchers, at Cornell University's Food and Brand Lab, also found that people seem to feel more trust and connection to cereal characters who make eye contact.

"Simply seeing eyes, even if it's a cartoon character, draws a lot more attention," the lab's Brian Wansink told ABC News. "It also increases your likelihood to want to purchase the cereal." 

Who knows? Happy's grown-up grin and gaze might end up selling Happy Meals, too.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.