Why do fast-food workers strike? No occupation is lower paid.

Fast-food workers are pressing a demand for pay of at least $15 an hour, far more than the $9 or so that is typical for the industry. Here's how their wages compare with other jobs in the economy.

David Goldman/AP
Fast food workers and supporters protest low wages outside a Krispy Kreme store, Thursday, May 15, 2014, in Atlanta. Fast-food workers and labor organizers used a nationwide day of protest to demand higher pay.

As fast-food workers and labor organizers used a nationwide day of protest to demand pay of at least $15 per hour in the industry, their motivations were summed up in different ways.

Some workers talked of wanting to earn enough to cover more than their rent.

Strike organizers argued that the industry’s typical pay of about $9 an hour is not a “living wage.” (Working 35 hours per week at that rate nets $16,380 per year. Although that’s above the official poverty line for one or two people, it doesn’t go far.)

Selmira Wilson, a protester in Miami who works at McDonalds, said that to support her three children she cleans offices at night “just to get by,” according to a Reuters report.

On top of those, here’s one more factor to tuck into the mix: No occupation out of the more than 1,300 tracked by the US Labor Department is lower paid.

The occupation “Cooks, Fast Food” clocked in at $9.07 in the survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) a year ago. That was less than half the nation’s average hourly wage of $22.33.

Fast-food cooks were followed by “Combined Food Preparation and Serving Workers, Including Fast Food” ($9.08 per hour), “Shampooers” ($9.09 per hour), “Fast Food and Counter Workers” ($9.13 per hour), and Dishwashers ($9.22 per hour).

Of all the occupations that earn on average below $10 per hour, the list includes a number of others related to food services, as well as ticket takers, cashiers, and farm laborers.

When the occupations are simplified into 438 broad categories for which the BLS can track hourly wages, 360 of them earn an average pay rate of at least $15 an hour – the wage the strikers are seeking.

Only 18 percent of the broad occupations earn less than $15 an hour. But lots of workers are employed in those positions – nearly 48 million workers in all, or 36 percent of the workers tracked by the BLS.

Here’s a list of some representative occupations ranked by average hourly pay:

• $9.00 to $14.99 an hour (36 percent of workers) The jobs already mentioned, plus home health aides, childcare workers, tellers, meat processing workers, telemarketers, building cleaners, retail sales persons, security guards. 

• $15.00 to $22.33 – the national average – (26 percent of workers) Customer service representatives, bill collectors, truck drivers, construction laborers, logging workers, administrative assistants, welders, preschool teachers, correctional officers, heating and air conditioning mechanics.

• $22.34 to $34.99 (20 percent of workers) Firefighters, social workers, news reporters, postal workers, brickmasons, derrick operators, paralegals, electricians, plumbers, computer support specialists, librarians, aircraft mechanics, registered nurses, accountants.

• $35.00 to $49.99 (7 percent of workers) Detectives, logisticians, computer system administrators, engineers (including civil and mechanical), construction managers, air traffic controllers, mathematicians.

• $50.00 to $92.25 (5 percent of workers) Engineers (chemical, aerospace, and nuclear), operations managers, pharmacists, lawyers, dentists, chief executives. Physicians and surgeons came out at the top of the list, at $92.25 per hour, just ahead of chief executives at $85.77.

For some occupations, especially teaching but also legislators and many airline workers, the BLS survey offers no wage data. Those asterisks in the data account for another 5 percent or so of workers.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.