How scientists cooked up a pasta-shaped molecule for your smartphone

A polymer shaped like wagon-wheel pasta can emit light in all directions, significantly reducing the amount of light wasted in LEDs, the authors of a new paper say.

Stefan Jester/University of Bonn/University of Utah
A proposed shape for the polymer used in organic LEDs takes its cues from wagon-wheel pasta, as opposed to the spaghetti-like design of the polymers used in current LEDs.

Spaghetti or rotelle?

This is not a culinary question – it’s a materials science one, and answering it could bolster the battery life of future smartphones.

Right now, organic LEDs are made with repeated molecular units that look like a spaghetti noodle. The linear shape means that light can move in just one direction, allowing just 20 percent of the light to escape the LED and leaving the other 80 percent trapped inside.

And LEDs can do better, according to a new paper published in Nature Chemistry on Sunday that describes a round organic molecule that could make LEDs, already at the forefront of energy efficient, high-tech lighting, even more efficient.

The new shape for the cooked-up molecule still takes its cues from pasta. But, instead of spaghetti, this time it’s rotelle, also known as wagon-wheel pasta. This six nanometer wide, spoke-wheeled molecule can emit light in all directions, significantly reducing the amount of light wasted in LEDs, the authors say.

“OLEDs are yet efficient,” says Sigurd Höger, a researcher involved in synthesizing the rotelle-shaped molecule at the University of Bonn and an author on the paper. “However, there are some problems with the light that is trapped inside the device.”

“And maybe we can make them more efficient,” he said.

LEDs, or light emitting diodes, have found out a plum spot in the lighting market in recent years. They use just 25 percent of the energy that an incandescent bulb requires and last about 25 times longer. LEDs illuminate households, make street lamps glow, backlight smartphone screens, and ring in the New Year on the ball dropped in Times Square. They have, in short, come light years from the unappealing red spots that first blinked onto the market in the 1960s.

LEDs have also acquired a sibling: Organic LEDs. Often called OLEDs, these lights use organic polymers, not silicon semiconductors, and are more pliable than conventional LEDs. Still less common relative to their inorganic counterparts, OLEDs have all the glitz and gloss of the tech of the future, appearing in Samsung’s Galaxy smartphone series and in its line of ultra-thin (and ultra-expensive) televisions and laptops, as well as in crisp and bright products from Sony and LG.

But efforts to make OLEDs even more efficient have bumped against a prohibitive factor: single polarization. Light waves oscillate, and the direction in which they oscillate is called a polarization. In current OLEDs, an electric current running through the spaghetti-like polymer is limited to moving in one direction. In other words, it has one polarization.

This results in just 20 percent of the light actually getting out of the OLED, an inefficient use of energy that means that even the latest models of smartphones have, at best, about two days battery life.

But a wagon-wheel molecule – what the researchers call a “π-conjugated spoked-wheel macrocycle” – has an advantage over the spaghetti-design: it is symmetrical. This round shape emits light in not just one direction, but in any direction at random – that is, light is not restricted to a single polarization. The scenario can be imagined as attempting to balance a pencil straight up on its tip: let go, and the pencil will fall over in a random direction each time, the authors said.

Using the round molecules will reduce the light waste from about 80 percent to 50 or 60 percent, a feat that could keep smartphones juiced up for longer, the authors reported.

“If the light output is more efficient, less light has to be generated and that saves the battery,” says Dr. Höger.

Rotelle-shaped molecules will require extensive research before they are menu-ready, says Höger, as these new molecules were synthesized at a cost prohibitive to commercial purposes.

A rotelle-shaped molecule “is something for the future,” he said. For now, we’ll have to make do with good, ol’ spaghetti. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.