New human species discovered? How China fossils could redefine 'human'

Scientists have recently dated and described fossils from what may be a new species of hominid, the Red Deer Cave people. The discovery could shed new light on emergence of humankind in East Asia. 

REUTERS/David Reich et al./Nature/Handout
A molar from an early human species called Denisova is shown in this image from December 2010. Scientists may have found a new species of humans, a group known as the Red Deer Cave people.

Skulls, jawbones, and teeth originally unearthed decades ago in two caves in China are beginning to shed new light on human evolutionary history, particularly in East Asia.

The fossils were found in Longlin Cave in China's Guangxi Province in 1979 and in Maludong Cave in Yunnan Province in 1989. The bone fragments may have belonged to a previously unknown species of Homo, the same genus as modern humans.

The Red Deer Cave people, as scientists are calling them, share some features with modern humans. But they also differ, suggesting that, for much of our history, Homo sapiens in East Asia might have co-existed, and perhaps competed, with other animals that could also lay claim to the designation 'human.'

"It is clear that they share no particular affinity with either Pleistocene East Asians," say the researchers in their recent paper reported in the journal PLoS ONE. They don't seem to be related to modern East Asians either. 

The Red Deer Cave people, so named for their taste for the meat of a now-extinct species of deer, had skulls that looked very different from those of all modern humans, including those alive today and those who lived in Africa 150,000 years ago. They had similar frontal lobes, but lacked a modern chin, for example.

The timing of the Red Deer Cave peoples' existence, between 11,500 and 14,500 years ago, overlapped with the presence of more modern-looking humans to the south and east. Apparently, they interbred very little with our ancestors, say the study's authors.

The Red Deer Cave people may have been related to the Denisovan people, a recently discovered and little-understood possible human relative that lived 30,000 to 50,000 years ago, suggested Chris Stringer at the Natural History Museum in London to the New Scientist. It's still unclear exactly how either the Denisovan or Red Deer Cave people might fit-in to the human evolutionary tree. 

"What the discovery shows is just how complicated, how interesting, human evolutionary history was in Asia right at the end of the Ice Age," said Darren Curnoe, associate professor in the School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of New South Wales and lead author of the study about the find, according to Discovery News.

The dated, described specimens help fill gaps in scientists' knowledge of human origins in East Asia. Researchers hope to further understand these ancient people's relationship with modern humans by examining DNA extracted from the fossils.

In a 1990 paper, Richard Alexander then of the Museum of Zoology at the University of Michigan summarized human's desire to know more about our evolution: "Perhaps we care partly because we know intuitively that to understand how we came to be may tell us things of value about modern human activities, especially those that perplex and frighten us."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to