Wildlife more threatened by climate change than previously thought

A new comprehensive study of previous research has grim conclusions, but could bolster efforts to protect species from climate change.

Norm and Kristina Senna/AP/File
This Nov. 30, 2015 photo provided by Norm and Kristina Senna shows A black bear walks down on a trail in Georgia, Vt., on Nov. 30, 2015. Later winters in recent years is contributing to delayed hibernation for some black bears and making snowshoe hares conspicuous to predators. Access to food is keeping some bears out of their winter dens.

After years of warnings that climate change poses a threat to Earth’s biodiversity, a new study finds that the damage has already begun.

The authors of a paper published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change performed a “comprehensive analysis” of 130 previous studies on how climate change has affected threatened and endangered species.

"We did the study because no one had really pulled together the evidence of how much climate change has impacted species to date," one of the study’s co-authors, James Watson, told LiveScience.

Concerns about wildlife losses are nothing new, but this new study demonstrates that climate change is pressuring endangered species more than previously thought.

Scientists had previously estimated that 4 percent of birds and 7 percent of mammals on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s “Red List” are threatened by climate change, according to Science Recorder.

But this new study says the effects of climate are much, much broader. Dr. Watson and his colleagues revised those estimates upward to 23.4 percent of threatened birds and 47 percent of threatened terrestrial mammals.

While the study focused just on birds and mammals, Watson, director of the science and research initiative at the Wildlife Conservation Society based in New York City, says it bodes poorly for the well-being of other species.

"We looked at only the most mobile species that probably should adapt the best and we found that they're getting hammered," he told LiveScience. Plants, aquatic, and cold-blooded animals could have an even harder time adjusting to higher temperatures, more frequent natural disasters, and other climate change-induced changes.

This conclusion comes on the heels of findings that 58 percent of wildlife populations have declined since 1970, and that one-tenth of Earth’s wilderness areas have been destroyed since 1993.

Now, conservationists are repurposing legal tools meant to protect endangered species from older threats to keep them safe from the effects of climate change.

In 2008, polar bears became the first species to receive Endangered Species Act protections based on climate-change projections. Bearded seals followed suit last October. At the time, The Christian Science Monitor reported:

“The legal battle for bearded seals is similar to the one wrought for polar bears, and there may be more to come, some experts say, especially with other species of seals. Previous studies have also found that birds and some other animals are similarly threatened by climate change due to loss of habitat.”

The new comprehensive analysis of these studies may bolster conservationists’ work, and not a moment too soon. "We have to give species their best chance to overcome this, and the only way to do that is to keep nature intact," Watson told LiveScience. "It's pretty simple really, we've just got to stop altering nature and degrading nature. We’ve got to keep things functioning and hope for the best."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Wildlife more threatened by climate change than previously thought
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today