How Brazil curbed Amazon deforestation by 90 percent in 10 years

Brazil has been successfully working since 2004 to slow deforestation of the Amazon, mostly by enforcing laws, but also by designating parts of the rainforest as national park land. 

Domenico Pugliese/Survival International/AP
Awa Indians stand in the Amazon forest in Brazil. Brazil has managed its forests and slowed the rate of deforestation significantly in the last 10 years.

Deforestation in the Amazon rainforest of Brazil has plummeted in the last decade, as the government has made new agreements with farmers and ranchers and enforced laws against those who clear land illegally. 

Enforcement of existing laws has contributed the most to dropping rates of deforestation, Daniel Nepstad, executive director at Earth Innovation Institute, a research organization for sustainable farming methods, told The Christian Science Monitor. A "command and control strategy" penalizes anyone who clears forests illegally. 

"It was possible through practical enforcement of previous and new regulations," Dr. Javier Godar, a research fellow with the Stockholm Environment Institute, told The Christian Science Monitor. He said law enforcement had to improve how the forest was being monitored.

Beginning in 2004, the government of Brazil has protected half of its Amazon rainforest land from deforestation by designating it as national park land, according to GoodNewsNetwork. The amount of forest land cleared annually in Brazil dropped from 10,500 square miles in 2005 to 1,850 square miles in 2014. 

Deforestation peaked in 2003 and 2004, when Brazil cleared 10,700 square miles, but in 2008 then-President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva began working on government policies to slow the decline, the Los Angeles Times reported. 

Farmers have been at the root of the change, Dr. Nepstad says. Some were removing forests in order to plant soybeans, but the "Soy Moratorium" and "Cattle Agreement" cut off farmers and ranchers who were clearing more forest from the legal markets.

The forest's rebound is "fragile," Nepstad says. Maintaining the current, lower rate of deforestation will take effort. He suggests that the system needs more "carrots" – positive incentives to the farmers and ranchers who abstain from clearing land.

Some Brazilian soybean farmers have traveled to Bolivia and Paraguay, but researchers do not know whether they have left because of the crackdown on deforestation in Brazil. Dr. Godar says the government presence increased in the Amazon in order to achieve this, but deforestation enforcement need not stop Brazilian farmers from working without clearing Amazon land.

"It is important to say that there is an abundance of abandoned areas in the Amazon – especially low producing, semi-abandoned pastures – so there is scope to increase the productive farming area without clearing the forest in large areas of the Amazon," he told The Christian Science Monitor. 

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff said the focus on enforcement will continue, and the country aims to end all illegal deforestation in Brazil by 2030, the Los Angeles Times reported. To help meet this goal, German Chancellor Angela Merkel pledged to give Brazil $618 million after she she visited the country in August, with much of it reserved for rainforest work. 

[Editor's note: An earlier version of the story misstated the square milage of forests cleared.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How Brazil curbed Amazon deforestation by 90 percent in 10 years
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today