After Charlottesville, a calling out of claims on racial superiority

The strong reaction of many Americans to the Virginia tragedy helps show the false claims of white supremacists about skin color.

AP Photo
Mourners listen to speakers in Savannah, Ga., at an Aug. 13 candlelight vigil for the victims in Charlottesville, Va.

Whether through peaceful rallies, prayer vigils, or family discussions, many Americans gave a strong reproof to the claims of racial superiority that were behind the Aug. 12 violence in Charlottesville, Va. Their president may have failed to quickly join the widespread condemnation. Yet the strong reaction to President Trump’s initial silence on the role of white supremacists helps illustrate a deeper national trend: Fewer people than ever accept that skin color is a measure of character or a reason for special treatment.

The popular rebuke of racial hatred after Charlottesville, however, seems hardly enough after so many high-profile cases of racially charged violence in the United States. Actions must speak louder than words. Each of the recent tragedies driven by false views about race requires even more potent examples of racial equality and the common good.

What binds Americans is more important than their joint condemnation of fictitious beliefs about race. First, they must acknowledge the progress already made on race relations to counter the illusions espoused by fringe right-wing groups. “Remember how far we’ve come,” said President Obama in one of his many speeches on race. This collective gratitude would then allow further dialogue on ways to keep racist radicalism in check and solve issues of social and economic inequality.

Such progress would be the best antidote to the mistaken views of the angry few who join white supremacist groups. The US has indeed made great strides related to race, so much so that Mr. Trump felt pressured two days after the Charlottesville tragedy to proclaim that any group that causes violence in the name of racism is “repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.” Now perhaps he, like many others, can work on those commonalities that are “dear.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to After Charlottesville, a calling out of claims on racial superiority
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today