Looking for ways to prevent ‘another Charleston’

The first major reform proposed after the racial killings in South Carolina was to remove a symbol from the state capitol: the Confederate flag. This may seem minor, but it signals how America deals with racism today.

The Confederate battle flag flies at the South Carolina State House grounds in Columbia, SC June 20.

After a white racist killed nine blacks in a South Carolina church on June 17, many Americans asked what could have been done to prevent such a tragedy. Tougher gun control? Greater surveillance of hate groups? Better anti-discrimination laws? No, the first major demand for reform was a call by South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, a Republican, to no longer fly the Confederate flag over the state capitol.

As a symbol of past slavery to many and a symbol of Southern heritage to others, the Confederate flag has long needed to come down from government buildings in the South. Flags must unify, not divide. And this one carries enough racist overtones that it might have even given license to the gunman who shot the African-Americans during worship at Charleston’s most historic black church.

America’s struggle to improve race relations since the Civil War has long focused on new laws and court rulings. These legal measures have removed much of the overt racism in public life. Now the struggle has shifted to changing attitudes rather than simply changing behavior. This means symbols like the Confederate flag are primary battlegrounds for taking the measure of lingering racism in people’s thinking – and ending it.

President Obama summarized this shift in approach during an interview on Monday with Marc Maron, host of the “WTF” podcast. “It is incontrovertible that race relations have improved significantly during my lifetime and yours, and that opportunities have opened up, and that attitudes have changed,” the president said. “What is also true is the legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination in almost every institution of our lives, you know, that casts a long shadow and that’s still part of our [mental] DNA that’s passed on. We’re not cured of it.”

He then told of his personal struggle growing up in trying to reconcile being seen as a black in society while being raised by a white mother. “I don’t have to be one way to be both an African-American and also someone who affirms the white side of my family,” he said. “I don’t have to push back from the love and values that my mom instilled in me.” He described his mother’s core values as kindness, honesty, hard work, and caring about others.

Preventing racist attacks like the one in Charleston will require a similar struggle in thinking among more Americans. Many black leaders have called for a “national dialogue” on race. In a small way, the debate over flying the Confederate flag has helped stir that dialogue.

But ultimately the choice by an individual to see beyond skin color and discern a person’s values takes moral courage. Conversations on race can help. Laws help. Altering symbols may help. But the choice is done one person at a time. Until no one feels a need to kill those of another race.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.