The key skill of Libya’s UN-chosen leader

Known as a listener who builds consensus, Fayez al-Sarraj must win over warring factions, unite an army, defeat Islamic State, revive the economy, and stem the flow of refugees.

AP Photo
Fayez al-Serrej, head of the U.N.-backed unity government meets with his team in Tripoli, Libya, March 31.

The United Nations is not in the habit of choosing a country’s leader, but in December it was forced to do just that for Libya. The North African nation has been in chaos and civil war for nearly five years since the fall of Muammar Qaddafi. Islamic State has gained a foothold with thousands of fighters while more than 300,000 people have fled from Libya’s shores to Europe.

So what sort of leader did the UN choose?

He is Fayez al-Sarraj, whose career credentials are that he is an architect and former housing technocrat who hails from a respected family in the capital. His father helped found postcolonial Libya. On March 30, he was finally able to go back to Tripoli as prime minister – under heavy guard – after being selected as the consensus candidate between major Libyan factions during UN-sponsored talks. 

His main attribute as a leader, however, may be that he hears people out to achieve a consensus, which will be critical to piecing together a country split apart by tribes, region, and ideology. “He listens more than he talks, and he thinks before speaking,” said a former Libyan ambassador and childhood friend, Abdu Alhameed, to Bloomberg.

In an Arab society more accustomed to bold-speaking strongmen, Mr. Sarraj is an unusual yet necessary choice. He heads the newly formed Presidential Council that runs the new Government of National Accord. His three deputies represent different parts of Libyan society. This executive body must operate by consensus. It must also work with two rival legislatures that claim to represent all of Libya. He will be helped along by the fact that the UN Security Council holds sway over Libya’s $67 billion sovereign wealth fund.

His goal of political reconciliation is daunting. But he was off to a good start with endorsements from a few key institutions: the central bank, the national oil company, and the Libyan investment authority. This gives him control of the nation’s purse as he tries to meld various militias into a national army that can defeat Islamic State. He might invite European or American forces to contribute to the fight.

For now, his listening skills are more needed than guns or money. “Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen,” said Winston Churchill. The UN may have done well by picking Sarraj for Libya.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.