The UN's faith in Libyan peacemongers

To reach a deal signed Thursday, the UN focused on people in Libya most interested in peace, not just the most powerful that rule parts of the country. This bottom-up approach, if it works, is a model in diplomacy.

AP Photo
From left to right, Mohammed Chouaib, head of delegation from the UN-recognized government in the eastern city of Tobruk, Libya, Fayez Sarraj, Libyan Prime minister and Dr. Saleh Almkhozom, Second Deputy Chairman of the Libyan General National Congress, react after signing a U.N.-sponsored deal aiming to end Libya's conflict Dec.17, in Sikhrat, Morocco. The signing of a U.N.-sponsored deal aims to end Libya's conflict by forming a unity government with the Libyan members from the country's two rival parliaments.

In the history of peace deals, a pact signed Thursday aimed at ending Libya’s civil war could be one for the books. Brokered by United Nations envoy Martin Kobler, it largely bypasses the biggest players – the guys with guns – who command rival governments in the east and west. Instead, it was anchored in those Libyans, such as mayors and civil society activists, who most want peace.

The UN has many reasons to arrange a peace in Libya. Four years after the overthrow of dictator Muammar Qaddafi, the oil-rich North African country has become an expanding base for Islamic State and other terror-exporting groups. It is a major terminal for Middle Eastern and African refugees to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. And it is awash with weapons that fuel conflicts in other African states.

Yet to reach a deal, Mr. Kobler focused mainly on the silent majority of Libyans fed up with the violent chaos and who don’t see their interests being met by the contending militias. And unlike in many other Arab societies, many Libyan peace activists are women – so much so that several have been killed for their efforts. Last month, a large group of Libyan women, who were forced into exile, met in Switzerland to help shape the UN’s agenda for the deal.

Kobler’s strategy relied on the hope that a deal signed by low-level peacemakers will soften the dueling rulers in the cities of Tripoli and Tobruk into accepting a formula for a government of national unity. If the deal works – and that will require strong international unity – Libya might just be able to repel Islamic State, rev up its oil exports again, and keep itself from splitting apart.

In some ways, Libya’s conflict is similar to violent gang wars in American cities. And as Boston discovered in the 1990s, the trick in curbing urban violence is to focus less on the warring parties and more on the peacemakers, such as neighborhood clergy, the mothers of teenage boys, and community activists. They are usually the gangs’ weak spot, or the social and spiritual order that is needed for peace.

Diplomacy is not always top down, just as peace is not merely the absence of conflict. If Libya’s peace pact holds, it will be because it was built on the power of a popular consensus for peace, not the power from the end of a gun.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.