The ‘healing’ aspect of a Japan-South Korea pact on ‘comfort women’

The agreement brings restitution and an official apology to 46 Korean women – and also a shared recognition of each nation’s role in rising above differences toward working together in Asia.

Former South Korean "comfort woman" Lee Ok-sun watches a news report on the result of meeting between foreign ministers of South Korea and Japan at the "House of Sharing," a special shelter for former "comfort women," in Gwangju, South Korea, Dec. 28.

In a pact with far more meaning than it appears, the leaders of Japan and South Korea agreed on Monday to jointly help a group of 46 Koreans recover their “honor and dignity.” The Koreans are former “comfort women,” a euphemism for the tens of thousands of women in Asia forced to work in brothels managed by the Imperial Japanese Army from 1932 to 1945. With this pact, these few survivors finally received a strong apology from Japan’s prime minister, Shinzo Abe. They also will be offered $8.3 million by the Japanese government to help in “healing” their mental “wounds.”

In reaching the agreement, Japan and South Korea have signaled they want to end the controversy over this emotional remnant from World War II and Japan’s colonial era. As their economies and democracies have matured, the two neighbors have come to realize that their national identities are more tightly bound to the universal values necessary to maintain order and freedom in both Asia and the world. And just as they now seek to restore the inherent dignity of the former comfort women, Japan and South Korea are claiming a greater role as responsible stakeholders in the international system, rising above any need to assert an ethnic identity against each other or to define their nations as victims. South Korea, especially, which has long struggled with North Korea for national legitimacy, has used issues with Japan to define itself.

Standing together for a common good will benefit both countries more than defining themselves in opposition to something.

In difficult negotiations over recent months, each country had to make concessions. Both were under pressure from their main ally, the United States, to find a solution. South Korea agreed to work with Japan in providing the official restitution to the women and to refrain from criticizing Japan over the issue in international forums. For Japan, by making the official payment, it elevated its responsibility from resting on a moral or humanitarian basis to one with legal implications. It had long considered all its postwar obligations to South Korea closed in a 1965 treaty that came with $800 million in economic aid and loans.

Japan and South Korea still have many differences, such as a dispute over islands, and in how to deal with North Korea. Yet in recent years their peoples have grown closer, measured in mutual admiration of each other’s popular culture and in number of visitors. Japan’s economy is the world’s third largest while South Korea’s is the 14th largest, which means their interests overlap more than ever. They also have a shared interest in dealing with China as a rising power that is making claims on its neighbors’ territories. The US also needs them to work together for defensive security and in expanding free trade.

Resolving the comfort women issue was not a symbolic move. Rather, it was identity affirming, for both the women and the two countries.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The ‘healing’ aspect of a Japan-South Korea pact on ‘comfort women’
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today