Japan, South Korea cozy up

By jointly honoring an anniversary, the two US allies can now finish making amends and start to work together for their common interests in Asia.

Reuters
South Korean President Park Geun-hye delivers a speech during a reception to mark the 50th anniversary of the normalisation of Japan-South Korea bilateral relations at a hotel in Seoul, South Korea, June 22. Behind her are the flags of each country.

Warm ties between Asian nations are often hindered by memories of bitter history and none more so than between Japan and South Korea. The two nations today are democracies, trading partners, and allies of the United States that face common adversaries. Yet their leaders rarely meet, mainly as a result of differences over the role of Imperial Japan during its 35-year colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula.

This diplomatic freeze thawed a bit on Monday. The countries’ prime ministers attended separate ceremonies in their respective capitals to mark an important anniversary: the normalization of bilateral relations in 1965, which came two decades after the end of World War II. 

For years after that official recognition, Japan assumed issues of the past had been settled. But when South Korea become democratic in the late 1980s, nationalist sentiments and domestic politics revived old disputes. Japan then issued official apologies in the 1990s. But South Korea has kept demanding more of Japan.

Monday’s joint ceremonies, while only symbolic, hint that Tokyo and Seoul are closer than ever to resolving past grievances, especially a dispute over Japan’s wartime use of thousands of Korean women as sex slaves, or “comfort women.” Much will now depend on a speech expected this August by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in marking the 70th anniversary of the end of the war. Can both Mr. Abe and South Korean President Park Geun-hye end the cycle of nationalist impulses in each country? The fact that the two leaders now seek to meet later this year gives some hope.

Healing wounds of the past will require humility on both sides to listen to each other’s concerns and to honor each other’s national identity. More can still be done to help the surviving “comfort women” and the two countries must agree on the history of that abuse. South Korea can also welcome Mr. Abe’s efforts to have Japan take on greater international responsibilities.

Just as important would be a mutual recognition that Asia needs Japan and South Korea to work together. The US, with 80,000 troops in the two countries, cannot remain the main guardian of peace in the region forever. China’s aggression and North Korea’s nuclear weapons require other Asian nations to resolve their disputes. Japan and South Korea, by recalling that day a half-century ago when they rose above their past, may be on the right path.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.