Anchors for rule of law on the high seas

Two actions in October may push Beijing to accept universal rules in maritime law: a UN court’s decision favoring the Philippines’ claim to islets taken by China and the transit of a US warship near a reef built up by the Chinese.

REUTERS/U.S. Navy/file
Chinese dredging vessels are seen in the waters around Mischief Reef in the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea earlier this year.

The modern idea that all seafaring people should abide by natural laws of conduct has been around for at least 400 years. It was best codified in the 1982 Law of the Sea Treaty. But in October the idea took two big leaps forward, showing once again the wisdom of having rules on the high seas based on universal principles.

In one instance, a United Nations-backed court decided Oct. 29 that it would rule on whether China violated maritime law in seizing reefs in the South China Sea claimed by the Philippines. China rejects the court’s jurisdiction even though it is party to the sea treaty.

The other instance was the intentional passage of a US Navy destroyer close to a new artificial islet built up with sand by China and located hundreds of miles from the Chinese coastline. The United States (which honors the treaty in practice but has yet to formally adopt it) wanted to protect a core tenet of the treaty – freedom of navigation for nonthreatening vessels.

Both actions have reverberated around Asia, which is rife with tense disputes over offshore territories. China is not the only nation to make dubious claims on what are sometimes submerged rocks. But its recent efforts to take formations largely underwater and build them up with military-capable surfaces has alarmed the region. Many Asian leaders welcome any actions to assert the rule of law rather than allow such disputes to be settled by force.

The UN tribunal, called the Permanent Court of Arbitration, will not rule directly on the Philippines’ claim of sovereignty. Rather it will decide the nature of the reef itself and whether the Philippines is entitled to an economic zone of 200 miles. The fact that the court took the case at all is a victory. Other countries in Southeast Asia might now file a legal challenge against China, possibly forcing it to accept that it cannot bully its neighbors with “ancient” claims on islands far from its shores. A favorable final ruling for Manila, perhaps coming next year, should help pressure China to abide by universal rules.

For nearly a decade, the nations of Southeast Asia have pushed China to abide by a code of conduct in their waters. So far it has resisted. As was the case with Russia taking Crimea from Ukraine, China prefers to set its own rules over territory or waters. But nations that rely on the sea benefit far more when they abide by rules that have worked for centuries. The recent action by both a UN court and the US asserts the need for a preeminence of law, one that is anchored in principles of the common good. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Anchors for rule of law on the high seas
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today