Country of the Year? Try Mexico.

Last week's approval of reforms for the pivotal oil company Pemex caps a year of major reforms that could transform Mexico – and perhaps change the immigration debate in the US.

AP Photo
Oil workers set the drill on a deep-water platform off the coast of Veracruz, Mexico. The administration of President Enrique Pena Nieto pushed for energy reform that will increase private investment in the state-owned oil company Pemex.

If an award could be given in 2013 for Country of the Year, Mexico might deserve it. No other country has done more this past year to put reforms in place to transform a nation – and with startling democratic consensus.

The latest reform, approved Thursday by elected lawmakers, will allow foreign and private investment in the oil sector for the first time in more than 70 years. The move upends a notion of Mexican patriotism that stated the national identity rests on government monopoly of the petroleum industry.

In adding this historic reform to earlier ones – in banking, taxation, education, telecommunications – Mexico is well on its way to implement an agreement among three political parties reached last December after the election of President Enrique Peña Nieto.

The successes of the so-called Pact of Mexico only adds to the nation’s achievements in becoming fully democratic in 2000 and in joining NAFTA in 1995. The new reforms also create optimism in the United States that the poorest among Mexico’s 112 million population might someday stop crossing the border for jobs.

The US debate over “immigration reform is going to be very passé,” said Gov. Rick Perry (R) of Texas last week, predicting that Mexico’s advances will create more domestic jobs for Mexicans. “The idea about border security may shift from the United States and Mexico border, down to the Guatemalan-Mexican border,”he added.

Mexico still has plenty of challenges in dealing with high levels of corruption, poverty, and drug-related violence. And implementing the reform laws will require political courage to make sure they are done with the least graft and widest benefit.

But a reformist attitude has been implanted in Mexico, driven by a desire to ensure that Latin America’s second-largest economy remains globally competitive.

As the fifth-largest producer of crude oil, Mexico badly needs reform of its national oil company, Pemex. The company provides about a third of the federal budget and is the nation’s single largest employer. Yet oil production has been in decline even with big investments. Despite its vast natural gas reserves, Mexico still imports gas from the US. Pemex needs foreign technology and advice, especially in tapping deep-water oil deposits and shale gas.

Reform of the oil industry would spill over into many parts of the economy. Being able to turn gas into fertilizer, for example, would help boost production on the 60 percent of Mexican farmland  not currently fertilized.

While the two main parties, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and the conservative National Action Party, have led the reform effort, it is Mexicans themselves who are slowly finding a new view of themselves. That is represented in a rising middle class and greater expectations of clean and effective politics.

The Pemex reforms, notes Mexican historian Enrique Krauze, reflect a desire to look more to the future than the past. That’s certainly deserving of some award.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Country of the Year? Try Mexico.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today