Philippines can 'build back better'

Mega-disasters like super typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines can be an opportunity for devastated communities to re-envision a different future, one built on resiliency to disaster and stronger community ties.

AP Photo
Survivors walk inside a damaged church at Tacloban city, Leyte province, Philippines on Sunday, Nov. 17. Typhoon Haiyan, one of the most powerful storms on record, hit the country's eastern seaboard Nov. 8.

After mega-disasters like typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines, aid officials often talk of a need to “build back better.” A recovery should not go back to old, often risky norms. Homes must be built to withstand ocean surges or earthquakes. Businesses should have built-in resiliency. Most of all, communities must re-envision a new future.  

Such talk has only begun in the Philippines. The Nov. 8 super typhoon has killed nearly 4,000 by the latest count and has left 4 million displaced. Some half a million homes have been damaged. A global outpouring of compassion has brought aid from 28 countries. The 1 in 10 Filipinos who work abroad have begun local aid drives.

Some of the quickest aid has came from the United States, a close ally of the Philippines and whose military is now well-practiced in Asia in its humanitarian response. The region is home to most of the world’s natural hazards.

A few signs of normalcy have begun in the storm-ravaged islands of Leyete and Samar. Tacloban city’s traditional flea market revived slightly on Saturday, with some people selling necessities such as clothes. A few gasoline stations have reopened. Homes are being reconstructed.

On Sunday, people gathered at churches to pray, console one other, and to give thanks. In Manila, the country’s Roman Catholic archbishop, Cardina Luis Antonio Tagle , sent this message: “It is a time to show a love that is stronger than an earthquake or a typhoon. With this love, human lives would be restored and our nation rebuilt.”

The Philippines must do more than rebuild to old standards. If climate change is bringing stronger storms, countries that lie in their path should not only build structures that can withstand a disaster. They can also create tighter communities and more durable local economies. A country’s physical capital is only as good as its “capital” in human caring, which can spring back more easily than material structures.

President Benigno Aquino has started to draft a strategic reconstruction plan, which he may propose in a couple weeks. He only visited the devastated areas this past weekend, both promising money for rebuilding but also asking survivors to begin the task themselves. “The process will move faster with your help,” he told residents in the hard-hit town of Guiuan.

The best kind of reconstruction can spur new types of economic growth, according to University of the Philippines professor Benjamin Diokno, former Philippine budget secretary. That happened after two previous disasters in the Philippines: an earthquake in 1990 and the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1992.

The part of the Philippines hit directly by Haiyan is highly dependent on fishing, coconut cultivation, and palm oil production. All three of these industries may be expensive to restore or take years to recover. Alternative livelihoods should be proposed for these communities. The Philippines has strong advantages in being open to trade and in having English as one of its languages.

The government can set up a central rehabilitation commission that can not only rebuild communities but work with residents to explore new types of businesses. Disasters can be an opportunity for local communities to weave a stronger and different future.  They can “build back better.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.