A Philippines at the ready for typhoons

As the toll mounts in the Philippines after super-typhoon Haiyan, the country can start to adapt better resiliency in preparation for its many natural disasters.

AP Photo
Residents rebuild their homes in Samar province Monday following Friday's typhoon Haiyan that lashed the central Philippines.

By its size and wind speed, the super-typhoon that hit the Philippines on Friday was an epic event in weather history. But as both Filipinos and much of the world respond to the immense devastation and rising death toll, the Philippines itself may be at an epic moment in being better prepared for natural disasters.

Every nation has its own shock absorbers for such calamities, such as proper zoning and close social ties. Filipinos have their own spirit of bayanihan, or neighborly deeds of empathy, as well as a tropical abundance of materials to rebuild houses.

But too many nations still simply respond to disasters rather than prepare for them. The Philippines might be expected to be a leader in such resiliency. It is considered the world’s most disaster-prone area, second to Japan in tropical storms and highly vulnerable to earthquakes. Its capital, Manila, tops the list of world cities struck by floods and similar tragedies. Such disasters cost the Southeast Asian country an average of $1.6 billion a year. This latest typhoon affected 10 percent of the population, or nearly 10 million people.

Yet its Congress passed a “disaster risk management” law only three years ago. And implementation has been largely snarled up in committees and corruption. Some new flood-protection infrastructure has been built. A new warning system, called Project Noah, gives advanced notice of impending floods. And many schools now integrate disaster preparedness in their teaching. But as Sen. Loren Legarda, chair of a key legislative panel, stated last month, such resilience efforts are not being given serious attention.

Compared to most developing nations, however, the Philippines has a high number of people on social media. After Typhoon Pablo last year, the sharing of local information helped to quickly identify places most in need of relief, enabling volunteers to better respond.

Strong community ties are the best preparation for disaster. “The journey toward resilience is the great moral quest of our age,” write Andrew Zolli and Ann Marie Healy in a recent book, Resilience: Why Things Bounce Back. “It is the lens with which we must necessarily adjust our relationship to one another, to our communities and institutions, and to our planet.”

The Philippines’s disaster-management law calls on the government to address “the root causes” of the country’s acute vulnerabilities to disasters. More than material preparation, however, the first requirements are the intangibles of character, such as a humility to recognize the need to adapt to risk and a willing generosity to assist others. The late anthropologist Clifford Geertz found that religion helps humans deal with what seem like senseless events. It allows them to reject the notion that “life is unendurable.”

After the outsized tragedy of Typhoon Haiyan, the Philippines may finally reject any fatalism about its natural disasters. Enduring them with a well-planned resilience should now become the new norm.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A Philippines at the ready for typhoons
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today