Amid another North Korea storm, look who's calm

South Koreans, unlike many around the world, don't react with fear to North Korea's verbal and nuclear threats. Why this wise reaction?

AP Photo
South Korean vehicles line up as ususal at the border office in Paju on April 1 to head to the North Korean city of Kaesong. North Korea has threatened to shut down the border factory complex that is a symbol of inter-Korean cooperation.

Since 2005, North Korea has tested three nuclear devices while violating international law with its missile launches. These actions, when linked to its recent high-pitched threats against the United States and South Korea, have evoked fear around the world of imminent war on the Korean Peninsula.

There’s only one problem with this perception. The South Korean people, millions of whom live within artillery range of the border, have mostly remained calm amid the storm. It’s business as usual on the streets of Seoul.

The South knows its northern cousins well and has seen this act before – Pyongyang makes threats only to then demand economic concessions. In fact, after weeks of verbal bombast and military maneuvers, the North declared Monday that a stronger economy remains its top goal.

And despite a threat to do so, it has not closed the Kaesong Industrial Complex, a site inside North Korea where factories run by South Korean firms employ North Korean workers.

The rest of the world should learn from South Korea, which has largely refused to let fear guide its actions. It has built itself up as a beacon of political freedom and market-based prosperity. In contrast to that model, North Korea is now under an official United Nations inquiry for its human rights violations, of which there are plenty.

To be sure, the US remains primarily responsible for deterring North Korea with a commitment of massive retaliation if Pyongyang triggers a war. The Obama administration sent B-2 stealth bombers and F-22 Raptors near North Korea last week to remind its new leader, Kim Jong-un, of the  longstanding American promise. This US support certainly helps keep South Korea calm and prevents it from developing its own nuclear arsenal.

If South Korea were really worried about an attack, it would be seeking a military alliance with Japan and forgive that country’s wartime past. It would not have built up strong economic ties with China, the only ally of North Korea. It would not keep offering food aid to hungry North Koreans out of a humanitarian concern and in hopes of showing them the truth about their “enemy.”

Still, South Korea’s spine has stiffened since 2010 after the sinking of one of its Navy ships and the shelling of civilians on one of its islands. Dozens of people were killed. Thus the new president, Park Geun-hye, has released the military to respond immediately to such provocations rather than wait for political advice.

South Korea’s patience with China is also wearing thin. It is waiting to see if Beijing actually follows the new UN sanctions against North Korea. China has faltered on such obligations in the past out of a strategic interest in keeping North Korea intact and as a buffer state.

Two decades ago, South Korea began to see the North in a new light, as a country already defeated by its misguided Marxist and dynastic despotism. Hopes of any quick reunification were put on hold because of the high costs. North Korea was to be nurtured calmly to open up.

The world media still often repeats North Korea’s threats without much history or context, such as the need of a very young Kim Jong-un to establish his power over his own military. These global fears may lead South Koreans to wonder if they are wrong, or in the words of humorist Jean Kerr (in a riff on a Rudyard Kipling poem): “If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, it’s just possible you haven’t grasped the situation.”

Yet South Korea’s record of grasping the situation is strong. Its elections help each new president in the Blue House better define the mix of carrots and sticks for dealing with each new Kim who rules in Pyongyang. This keeps the cousin rivalry in line.

And it should eventually help calm the world’s overreaction to North Korea’s rhetoric and nuclear program.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.