'Petraeus scandal' as a mirror on marriage

As the 'Petraeus scandal' widens with probes and politics, it should also throw a spotlight on the state of marriage.

In this 2011 photo, Gen. David Petraeus walks with his wife, Holly, past a seated Paula Broadwell (r.) as he arrives to testify before a Senate panel.

Before Washington goes off on too many tangents of the “Petraeus scandal” – we shouldn’t forget that this high-level affair is only the latest public example of the state of marriage in America.

Marriage rates have fallen in the past decade even as one public figure after another – John Edwards, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Eliot Spitzer, Mark Sanford, to name a few – have had their infidelities revealed. More than 40 percent of people between ages 18 and 29 now see marriage as obsolete.

The extramarital affair of Gen. David Petraeus with his official biographer, Paula Broadwell, stands out even more because of the trust that he earned in the military and national security fields. Yet now trust in his marital fidelity has failed. So his resignation as CIA director was necessary. Why? Because his willingness to privately harm his family could result in his harming others in his official duties.

The general admitted as much in his resignation note: “After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization [CIA] such as ours.” 

Restoring trust in a marriage after an act of infidelity isn’t easy. Only about a third of couples succeed, most notably Bill and Hillary Clinton. Perhaps David and Holly Petraeus can do so now, given his public act of contrition. The larger task for America after this latest marital shock is to restore trust in marriage itself.

The ideal of marriage as a lifelong union to the exclusion of all others has eroded. In 2010, barely half of American adults were married, down from nearly three-quarters of adults a half century ago. The current figure could now be below 50 percent. And a recent study at the University of Virginia’s National Marriage Project found that the happiness of marriages for moderately educated Americans has dropped while their divorce rates are up.

The state of marriage as a public issue rarely has staying power. Yet stable marriages are the bedrock of both society and the economy. And, writes Britain’s chief rabbi, Jonathan Sacks, marriage is “the single most compelling metaphor for the relationship between God and us – because it involves commitment, a mutual pledge of openness and trust, a promise that neither will walk away in difficult times.”

Fidelity in a marriage relies on the binding of each spouse’s higher qualities for mutual support. That is the best guard against a wandering eye. Others can support those bonds through various means, such as spiritual advice, while government policies can bolster the economic and legal conditions that help maintain marriage.

No single event may finally force attention on the marriage crisis in America, although the Petraeus affair comes close. Before the official probes and the politics of this scandal go too far, perhaps Americans should focus on the icing that’s been melting off the wedding cake called marriage.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Petraeus scandal' as a mirror on marriage
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today