Readers write: Laws about wages in the US, kindness in the face of intolerance, and progress in agriculture

Letters to the editor for the Jan. 28, 2019 weekly magazine.

Markus Schreiber/AP
Refugees line up for a train to Munich at the train station of the south German border town Passau, Germany, Sept. 15, 2015.

Laws about wages in the US

I found the Oct. 15 cover story, “Faces of a new capitalism,” very interesting indeed. It was well written and easy to understand. 

I’m not truly politically minded, more of an independent, but I do read the signs of the times. 

My one question would be, why is it not feasible to make a law that businesses must pay a living wage to employees, according to the area they live in? A conservative told me that this would just send costs up and businesses could not compete with each other. 

But perhaps a business should not exist if it cannot perform morally. It seems to me to be totally immoral to pay someone a wage for a full week’s work that they cannot live on. 

Would it be possible to address this issue, please?

Auriel Wyndham Livezey

Lake Forest, Calif.

Kindness in the face of intolerance

Many thanks for sharing the Nov. 19 Home Forum essay, “Bystander training.” Reading this piece once was not enough. 

The first reading stunned me with the beautiful outcome of moral courage shown by those who stood up for a stranger. 

The mental picture brought about by writer Catharina Coenen’s phrase “white hand on brown skin” made it difficult to read through tears, as did the rest of the essay. 

This snapshot of the goodness of humanity that can be found in the world drew me back to the last five paragraphs of the essay a few more times. 

I just didn’t want to let go of the joy this brought me. There’s so much kindness around. It’s good to be looking for it throughout our days. I wonder what difference it made in the life of that young man and the man who was expressing intolerance. My hope is that it helped both men.

The essay made me ask myself, would I be as brave as those passengers who stood up for love and right?   

Judith Quimby

Grants Pass, Ore.

Progress in agriculture

Regarding the Nov. 16 Monitor Daily article “Fertilize by drone, till by text: Making tech work for Africa’s farmers”: I love this report, since I visited Ghana often when I worked for Goodyear International in the early 1970s while based in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. 

Glad to read of the progress in the agriculture sector. This story took me back. 

Bob Whittlesey

Spokane, Wash.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Readers write: Laws about wages in the US, kindness in the face of intolerance, and progress in agriculture
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today