Readers write: Older operagoers, Middle East coverage, political history

Letters to the editor for the June 26, 2017 weekly magazine.

Jonathan Tichler/Metropolitan Opera/AP
The Metropolitan Opera House stands in Lincoln Center Plaza in New York in 2009.

Older operagoers

Regarding the May 31 article “As curtain falls on the Met’s 50th anniversary season at Lincoln Center, what’s next for opera in America?”
( I am 75 years old and have been going to the opera since I was 16. 

The prediction that the opera audience is dying off and the future is in great doubt could have been written at any time. I looked at the audiences in the 1960s, ’70s, etc., and everyone seemed to be old and gray – and they still are. 

Maybe going to the opera is the secret to the Fountain of Youth!

Bill Harrison

Raleigh, N.C.

Middle East coverage

Regarding the June 5 OneWeek article “US pivots back to Saudi Arabia”: Scott Peterson’s reports are always insightful and excellent. His knowledge and understanding of this area of the world makes for superior reporting that I can trust.

Rockville, Md.

Political history

Regarding the June 12 OneWeek article “Diplomatic back channels not new” : I am very appreciative of this article. This story sheds some historical light for generations of readers perhaps not knowing the history of back channels and their importance. 

I was in junior high school in New York City during the Cuban missile crisis and experienced the bold newspaper headlines and feelings of fear in the public. Facts can help remove the political bull’s-eye currently painted on Jared Kushner and others for talking with the Russians. If mistakes of protocol were made, then they should be brought to light and we should move on.

Attempts to influence the US presidential election is a different story. More facts are needed about that. 

Thank you for your excellent coverage.

Peter J. Jensen

Chesterfield, Mo.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Readers write: Older operagoers, Middle East coverage, political history
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today