Mandela belongs to the world

Mandela is revered worldwide as champion of nonviolence and peace. Human rights activists and freedom fighters around the globe aim to follow his example of reconciliation, forgiveness, and non-retributive justice. This philosophy will be vital for future transitions in Iran and Syria.

Muhammed Muheisen/AP
South African children try to reach the hand of a performer on stilts during an event to pay tribute to former president Nelson Mandela, in Soweto, South Africa, Dec. 9. South Africa is readying itself for the arrival of a flood of world leaders for the memorial service and funeral for Nelson Mandela.

Martin Luther King Jr. once said: “If a man hasn’t discovered something he will die for, he isn’t fit to live.” Nelson Mandela was a man who cherished the ideal of a free society all his life, an ideal that, as he proclaimed at his trial in Pretoria in April 1964, he hoped to live for, but if need be, die for.

He has now died as he had always lived, a free spirit. Mandela was neither a commander of great armies nor an emperor of vast lands. He could boast no scientific achievements or artistic gifts. Yet men, women, and children from all over the world join hands to pay homage to this brave man who led his country to democracy.

The death of Nelson Mandela signals the end of an era, not only for South Africa but for the whole world.

However, the late president of South Africa leaves behind multiple legacies. Mandela is revered around the world as a global symbol of nonviolence and peace. His principles on reconciliation and non-retributive justice are a great source of inspiration for human rights activists and freedom fighters around the world.

His philosophy of forgiveness can be best utilized for future nonviolent transitions in countries like Iran and Syria. 

Mandela’s genius was his ability to convince his black and white countrymen to share a future together while turning the page on the tragic past during the apartheid regime. This combination of compassion and pragmatism is so rarely found among world leaders. Mandela was charismatic through his strength of character, standing up for what he believed was right and fair, against authoritarian white rule of South Africa, and by the power of his humility and modesty.

Comparison with Mahatma Gandhi is inevitable, not only because Mandela said in an article in Time magazine in January 2000 that he was inspired by Gandhi, but because Gandhi lived and fought in South Africa from 1893 to 1914. Like Mandela half a century later, Gandhi was subjected to the racist behavior of the dominant white South African establishment and organized a nonviolent struggle for the rights of Indians in South Africa.

However, unlike Gandhi, Mandela held high public office, which brings different challenges. During his presidency, Mandela’s vision of a new South Africa suggested a society in which blacks as well as whites would benefit from general welfare. Mandela’s general goal was to construct and stabilize a multiracial democratic polity in a country where the white supremacist groups were able to promote black-on-black violence because of basic conflicts between the African National Congress and certain Zulu leaders.

Remarkably, in such a challenging setting, Mandela strengthened the social and political capabilities that he had honed during his early years as an ANC activist and later through self-discipline in prison. His brilliant stratagem to unite the country behind the South African national rugby team was a way to find a common ground between the fearful white minority and the non-white South Africans who considered the Springboks a symbol of apartheid.

Like Gandhi, Mandela served as a moral compass for his people, and unlike so many politicians and activists, he pointed the needle of that compass towards forgiveness. He used to say, “If there are dreams about a beautiful South Africa, there are also roads that lead to their goal. Two of these roads could be named goodness and forgiveness.” 

Mandela knew that if forgiveness was to have a meaning in South Africa, the victims and those guilty of cruelty and violence had to share a common language and a common understanding of the future. To construct such a language, he combined the powerful African tradition of Ubuntu, meaning “humanity to others,” with the art of politics.

But Nelson Mandela stands out as one who had achieved the spirit of Ubuntu as the very path one must travel to know forgiveness and to empower others with it. For him this consciousness of Ubuntu was to emerge from 27 years of imprisonment, after which he declared: “As I walked out the door toward my freedom, I knew that if I did not leave all the anger, hatred and bitterness behind I would still be in prison.”

This idea remains a difficult one for many of us around the world who continue to think of freedom and justice in terms of violence, revenge, and retribution. As such, the triumphant expression of Mandela’s life’s work is not only in what he achieved in South Africa: the rule of law, freedom of speech, and free and fair elections. His triumph is in the imperishable lesson he holds for the ages to come: that of the seamless convergence of nonviolence and politics.

Nelson Mandela inspired the world with his faith in truth and justice for all mankind. His life was a message — a message of nonviolence over power, of finding ways to reconcile our differences, and of living in harmony with respect and love even for our enemy. Mandela belongs not only to South Africa, but to the entire world.

Ramin Jahanbegloo, the Iranian philosopher, dissident, and advocate of nonviolence, lives in exile in Canada. He is author of “Iran: Between Tradition and Modernity,” among other books.

© 2013 Global Viewpoint Network, Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Hosted online by The Christian Science Monitor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Mandela belongs to the world
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today