The benevolence of up-markets

Good vibrations in the market, especially those emanating from the third quarter of this year, go a long way toward solving lots of outstanding issues in a very benign and gentle way, Brown writes.

Jin Lee/AP/File
A pedestrian walks past the New York Stock Exchange in New York in this August 2011 file photo. Seasoned advisors fight through the tougher times knowing that good times are never far away, Brown writes.

There's a truism as old as time (or at least as old as the business of Other Peoples Money) and it concerns the benevolent effect produced by up-markets: Financial advisors love them more than anyone else.

This is the case for the following three reasons:

1. Billing off a higher base: Most advisors and money managers are paid based on their assets under management or AUM. When the market rallies, so too do most of the account values under their wing. This means they are charging their customary fee percentage but the base is a larger number.  There are two ways for an advisor to raise AUM, the first is the hard way - getting new clients, convincing existing clients to dump other relationships, networking, prospecting etc. The second way is the easy way - merely staying put  through a bull market. The increase from either pays the same.

2. A rising tide hides all mistakes: In a rally, a broad-based one at least, even the loser investments can start to look and feel like winners. They get dragged up thanks to the environment and the advisor who chose them gets a second chance to rethink that purchase decision. Easier to sell ugly merchandise into an up tape than book losses into a malaise or a correction.

3. Customer confidence improves: Advisors tend to be looked at in a more favorable light when the investment markets are acting well and things seem to be ticking along without a problem. Portfolios flourish on auto-drive, dividends are paid, gains are taken and conversations can turn from the stressful to the friendly - "Playing any golf this weekend? How's Jayden doing at Cal State this semester?"

As evidence of this last point, I point you towards a Marist Research survey published this week of 175 individuals with investable assets of $1 million or more, excluding primary residence.

Here's Julie Steinberg writing at the Wall Street Journal:

Millionaires appear to be more satisfied with their treatment at the hands of their wealth advisers. Just over 85% said they’re satisfied with their investment firm, up from 67% in 2010. The advisers themselves are also commanding more respect. Nearly three-quarters of respondents are pleased with how their advisers have managed their portfolios through difficult economic times. That figure jumped from 59% in 2010.

This amidst a backdrop of only 28% believing that the economy is healthy. In other words, they're not confident overall but they're extremely confident about their finance guy or gal.

Good vibrations in the market, especially those emanating from the third quarter of this year, go a long way toward solving lots of outstanding issues in a very benign and gentle way. Seasoned advisors fight through the tougher times (Fall 2011, Winter 2008, etc) knowing that times like these are never far away.

Source: Millionaires More Satisfied With Advisors (WSJ)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The benevolence of up-markets
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today