Squid and octopus populations on the rise

A recent study in Current Biology reveals that cephalopod populations, including squid, octopuses, and cuttlefish, have increased globally since the 1950s.

Courtesy of David Scheel
An octopus displays dark color and spread web and arms.

Human alteration of the environment has plagued the world’s oceans, contributing to both rising temperatures and acidification of waters. This change has led to the depletion of many marine species, but, as a recent study in Current Biology reveals, cephalopod populations, including squid, octopuses, and cuttlefish, have increased globally since the 1950s.

In the 1990s, scientists noticed a growth in cephalopod catches at fisheries across the world. From this data, scientists speculated that the cephalopod population was increasing. Because misreporting catch numbers is common and numerous factors can influence them, however, they could not conclude that the cephalopod population was increasing without a more rigorous study. 

Dr. Zoe Doubleday, a marine biologist at the University of Adelaide in Australia and lead author of the study, and her research team sought out data that would provide a more reliable estimate of population numbers. After months of research, they obtained 60 years of scientific survey data and fisheries records with which to work.

A thorough evaluation of this data provided a clear conclusion: worldwide cephalopod populations have increased significantly since the 1950s. Cephalopods, an invertebrate group, include squid, octopuses, and cuttlefish. Why are cephalopod populations, unlike most marine species, booming? The study’s researchers say that the group is very efficient at adapting to changes in the environment, enabling them to overcome the disturbances that have contributed to the depletion of other species. Although they only live for one to two years, they produce many eggs, and these eggs have low mortality rates, allowing them to adapt rapidly to environmental changes.

The researchers do note, however, that they can only speculate about which environmental changes are responsible for the increasing population. It is possible that when humans catch predators of cephalopods, they create a gap in the food chain for this adaptable species to fill. Another factor that may facilitate the population growth is rising temperatures. Warmer temperatures may make them reproduce more quickly and, in turn, increase the rate at which the population increases. Dr. Doubleday told Science Magazine that pinpointing causal relationships will require more research, noting that “it’s all speculation, what’s causing them to increase.”

Regardless of the cause, the population increase could dramatically affect our oceans. While it could benefit the sharks, whales, and large fish that feed upon them, it could also lead to unstable fishing profits. The researchers acknowledge that we will only realize this impact with time. 

This story originally appeared on Food Tank.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.